Comparison of Surgical and Conservative Treatments for Gartland Type II Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: Evaluation of the Need for Surgical Treatment

Background: Supracondylar humerus fractures (SHFs) are common pediatric injuries, with type II fractures being a topic of debate regarding optimal treatment. Our goals are to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment of type II SHFs and their subgroups and to identify parameters for determining the optimal treatment option. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 55 patients (23 conservative, 32 surgical) between 2010 and 2020. The mean follow-up was 66 months. Neurovascular status, range of motion, complications, and functional scores (Mayo elbow, Quick DASH) were evaluated. We performed radiographic assessment on initial, postreduction, and final follow-up radiographs using the humerocondylar angle (HCA), Baumann angle, and anterior humeral line (AHL). Results: Neither groups nor subgroups showed significant differences in clinical and functional outcomes. HCA was significantly higher in the operative group than in the conservative group. The subgroup analysis revealed that the HCA difference resulted from the difference between the conservative IIb and operative IIb subgroups. None of the patients required a corrective osteotomy, but 1 patient initially treated conservatively underwent operative treatment due to loss of reduction. Conclusions: Reconstructing the sagittal, coronal, and rotational alignment in type II SHFs led to good mid-term results in the range of motion and functional scores for the elbow joint, whether conservative or surgical treatment was used. A limited range of remodeling might be expected in the long term. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective comparative study.