创造力
情境伦理学
相关性(法律)
心理学
空格(标点符号)
工作(物理)
概念框架
工程伦理学
管理科学
知识管理
社会学
社会科学
社会心理学
计算机科学
政治学
工程类
机械工程
法学
操作系统
标识
DOI:10.1080/10400419.2022.2112837
摘要
This article was stimulated by a review of instruments assessing creative and innovative social environments seventeen years ago. This stands alone as the only published, comprehensive, comparative review of multiple instruments aimed at this conceptual space. Although this review provided an important contribution to the literature, there are a number of critical conceptual issues that should be considered when reviewing assessments of this kind. This article raises these issues and points out their relevance when developing, evaluating, or applying instruments – and applies these issues to the instruments included in the review. Further, the aim was also to provide updated information on the Situational Outlook Questionnaire, as there were a few potential misunderstandings contained within the Mathisen and Einarsen review. Finally, numerous criteria are offered for those creating or choosing to use measures of the work environment, climate, or culture that promotes organizational creativity and innovation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI