Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study

西妥昔单抗 医学 彭布罗利珠单抗 头颈部 肿瘤科 内科学 打开标签 头颈部鳞状细胞癌 化疗 基底细胞 头颈部癌 放射治疗 癌症 随机对照试验 外科 免疫疗法 结直肠癌
作者
Barbara Burtness,Kevin J. Harrington,Richard Greil,Denis Soulières,Makoto Tahara,Gilberto de Castro,Amanda Psyrri,Neus Basté,Prakash Neupane,Åse Bratland,Thorsten Fuereder,Brett Hughes,Ricard Mesı́a,Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon,Tamara Rordorf,Wan Zamaniah Wan Ishak,Ruey‐Long Hong,René González Mendoza,Ananya Roy,Yayan Zhang
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:394 (10212): 1915-1928 被引量:3142
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32591-7
摘要

Pembrolizumab is active in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression associated with improved response.KEYNOTE-048 was a randomised, phase 3 study of participants with untreated locally incurable recurrent or metastatic HNSCC done at 200 sites in 37 countries. Participants were stratified by PD-L1 expression, p16 status, and performance status and randomly allocated (1:1:1) to pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (pembrolizumab with chemotherapy), or cetuximab plus a platinum and 5-fluorouracil (cetuximab with chemotherapy). Investigators and participants were aware of treatment assignment. Investigators, participants, and representatives of the sponsor were masked to the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) results; PD-L1 positivity was not required for study entry. The primary endpoints were overall survival (time from randomisation to death from any cause) and progression-free survival (time from randomisation to radiographically confirmed disease progression or death from any cause, whichever came first) in the intention-to-treat population (all participants randomly allocated to a treatment group). There were 14 primary hypotheses: superiority of pembrolizumab alone and of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival and progression-free survival in the PD-L1 CPS of 20 or more, CPS of 1 or more, and total populations and non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin: 1·2) of pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for overall survival in the total population. The definitive findings for each hypothesis were obtained when statistical testing was completed for that hypothesis; this occurred at the second interim analysis for 11 hypotheses and at final analysis for three hypotheses. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population (all participants who received at least one dose of allocated treatment). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02358031.Between April 20, 2015, and Jan 17, 2017, 882 participants were allocated to receive pembrolizumab alone (n=301), pembrolizumab with chemotherapy (n=281), or cetuximab with chemotherapy (n=300); of these, 754 (85%) had CPS of 1 or more and 381 (43%) had CPS of 20 or more. At the second interim analysis, pembrolizumab alone improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the CPS of 20 or more population (median 14·9 months vs 10·7 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0·61 [95% CI 0·45-0·83], p=0·0007) and CPS of 1 or more population (12·3 vs 10·3, 0·78 [0·64-0·96], p=0·0086) and was non-inferior in the total population (11·6 vs 10·7, 0·85 [0·71-1·03]). Pembrolizumab with chemotherapy improved overall survival versus cetuximab with chemotherapy in the total population (13·0 months vs 10·7 months, HR 0·77 [95% CI 0·63-0·93], p=0·0034) at the second interim analysis and in the CPS of 20 or more population (14·7 vs 11·0, 0·60 [0·45-0·82], p=0·0004) and CPS of 1 or more population (13·6 vs 10·4, 0·65 [0·53-0·80], p<0·0001) at final analysis. Neither pembrolizumab alone nor pembrolizumab with chemotherapy improved progression-free survival at the second interim analysis. At final analysis, grade 3 or worse all-cause adverse events occurred in 164 (55%) of 300 treated participants in the pembrolizumab alone group, 235 (85%) of 276 in the pembrolizumab with chemotherapy group, and 239 (83%) of 287 in the cetuximab with chemotherapy group. Adverse events led to death in 25 (8%) participants in the pembrolizumab alone group, 32 (12%) in the pembrolizumab with chemotherapy group, and 28 (10%) in the cetuximab with chemotherapy group.Based on the observed efficacy and safety, pembrolizumab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil is an appropriate first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC and pembrolizumab monotherapy is an appropriate first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.Merck Sharp & Dohme.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
哇呀呀发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
赵zhao完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
肚子完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
jianjianjiang完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
石榴发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
一只兔子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
欣慰人生发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
带刺的玫瑰完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
wanci应助杨扬洋采纳,获得10
6秒前
李健应助苗条如冬采纳,获得10
6秒前
慕青应助Ignorance-Penny采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
王某人发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
蔡佩翰完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
顺颂时祺完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
yancaizhi发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
啊哈发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
peterlee发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
JiaJiaQing完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
sparks完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
maun222完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
随便完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
明芷蝶发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 400
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
New directions for experimental lessons in science teaching: Myth, Mystery, Necessity? by Emily K. da Silva Cunha Souto (Author), Flávia Lins Silva (Author) 333
Scientific experimentation in the classroom: Comparison between genetic-Socratic-exemplary teaching and workshop teaching by Ingrid Hofer (Author) 333
Programming for Chemical Engineers Using C, C++, and MATLAB 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6720861
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8457524
关于积分的说明 18056196
捐赠科研通 5972850
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2996229
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1972229
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1925931