正式舞会
患者报告的结果
口译(哲学)
医学
心理学
计算机科学
生活质量(医疗保健)
产科
护理部
程序设计语言
作者
Michael Krogsgaard,John Brodersen,Karl Bang Christensen,Volkert Siersma,Svend Kreiner,Jonas Jensen,Christian Fugl Hansen,Jonathan D. Comins
摘要
Abstract The purpose of this article was to introduce the reader to the nature of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) and pitfalls in their use. PROMs collect subjective information directly from the patient regarding specific or general conditions and add to clinical and functional outcomes, and turn unmeasurable subjective qualities into quantitative measures. PROMs are questionnaires consisting of items: questions or statements with predefined response options. The items in an adequate PROM have been developed by involvement of patients with the condition in focus, and the PROM has been validated for these patients using suitable statistical methods. An adequate well‐targeted PROM is more responsive than an inadequate PROM. Unfortunately, many studies use inadequate PROMs as outcomes. The methods used to generate PROMs should be described as thoroughly as those used to develop any other types of measurement instruments, and the choice of PROM should always be explained and thereby justified. If the PROM used is not adequate, the consequences for the interpretation of the results should be discussed. In many cases, an adequate PROM does not exist. If the best available PROM is chosen, there are methods to validate the adequacy of the chosen PROM, which make an interpretation of the study results possible.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI