安慰剂
医学
临床终点
交叉研究
麻醉
随机对照试验
外科
病理
替代医学
作者
Anja Sofie Petersen,Mads Barloese,Nunu Lund,Rigmor Jensen
出处
期刊:Cephalalgia
[SAGE]
日期:2016-03-25
卷期号:37 (3): 214-224
被引量:56
标识
DOI:10.1177/0333102416637817
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this article is to investigate possible differences in effect between three types of masks in the acute treatment of cluster headache (CH). Patients and methods Fifty-seven CH patients according to ICHD-II-criteria participated in a single-blinded, semi-randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover inpatient study, and 102 CH attacks were treated with 100% oxygen delivered by demand valve oxygen (DVO), O 2 ptimask or simple mask (15 liters/min) or placebo delivered by DVO for 15 minutes. Primary endpoint: Two-point decrease of pain on a five-point rating scale within 15 minutes. Results Only 10 CH patients had multiple attacks and reached the point of placebo. There were no significant differences between masks in the primary endpoints ( p = 0.412). After 15 minutes 48% had a two-point decrease using the DVO compared to 45% with placebo ( p = 0.867). After 30 minutes 68% were pain free or had pain relief using DVO and 45% by placebo ( p = 0.061). The DVO was preferred by 62% compared to 5% and 33% for simple mask ( p < 0.0001) and O 2 ptimask ( p = 0.061). In the first attack the DVO was significantly better at achieving pain relief at 15 minutes ( p = 0.018). Treatment with DVO or O 2 ptimask reduced the need for rescue medication compared to the simple mask (23%, 19%, 50%, respectively). No treatment-related adverse events were observed. Conclusion The primary endpoint with pain relief at 15 minutes was non-significant; however, a post hoc analysis of the first attack significantly favored DVO. Further, therapy by O 2 ptimask and DVO resulted in a decreased need for rescue medication. We recommend that CH patients be offered DVO or O 2 ptimask before oxygen therapy is abandoned.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI