作者
Silvia Mangiacavalli,Claudio Salvatore Cartia,Monica Galli,Sara Pezzatti,Angelo Belotti,Francesca Fazio,Roberto Mina,Magda Marcatti,Anna Cafro,Renato Zambello,Laura Paris,Gregorio Barilà,Cecilia Olivares,Alessandra Pompa,Rita Mazza,Francesca Farina,Martina Soldarini,Pietro Benvenuti,Giuseppina Pagani,Michele Palumbo,Valeria Masoni,Virginia Valeria Ferretti,Catherine Klersy,Luca Arcaini,Maria Teresa Petrucci
摘要
Lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd)-based triplets, in particular Carfilzomib-Rd (KRd) and Daratumumab-Rd (DaraRd), represent a standard of care in lenalidomide sensitive multiple myeloma (MM) patients in first relapse. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT), suggested better outcome with DaraRd. Trying to address this issue in clinical practice, we collected data of 430 consecutive MM patients addressed to Rd-based triplets in first relapse between January 2017 and March 2021. Overall, the most common used regimen was DaraRd, chosen in almost half of the cases (54.4%), followed by KRd (34.6%). Different triplets were used much less commonly. In the attempt to limit the imbalance of a retrospective analysis, we conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) comparison between DaraRd and KRd. After PSM, efficacy of DaraRd vs KRd was similar in terms of overall response rate (ORR) (OR: 0.9, p=0.685) as well as of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (OR: 0.9, p=0.582). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for DaraRd (29.8 vs 22.5 months; p=0.028). DaraRd was better tolerated, registering a lower rate of grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity (OR: 0.4, p.