医学
德诺苏马布
双膦酸盐
唑来膦酸
安慰剂
随机对照试验
假体周围
骨吸收
骨矿物
泌尿科
外科
内科学
骨质疏松症
关节置换术
替代医学
病理
作者
Karina Nørgaard Linde,Søren Rytter,Bente Langdahl,Frank Madsen,Maiken Stilling
标识
DOI:10.1302/0301-620x.107b8.bjj-2024-1376.r1
摘要
Aims The aim of this study was to investigate if adjuvant treatment with antiresorptive bone medication improves fixation of cementless total knee arthroplasty. We hypothesized that local bisphosphonate (zoledronate) or systemic denosumab would both decrease implant migration. Methods This four-way, double-blinded, randomized trial included 108 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis with a five-year follow-up. Three groups had the same cementless total knee tibial implant and were included in this primary study (n = 82). Patients were randomized to either placebo (n = 27), intraoperative local zoledronate (n = 28), or postoperative denosumab (n = 27). The primary outcome was tibial implant migration measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) using maximum total point motion (MTPM) and signed migrations. Secondary outcomes were biochemical bone markers (resorption: serum collagen type 1 cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX); formation: serum type 1 procollagen N-terminal (P1NP)), periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD), and patient-reported outcomes. Results At one year, the mean difference in MTPM between zoledronate and placebo was 0.43 mm (95% CI 0.01 to 0.85; p = 0.043), and 0.42 mm (95% CI 0.00 to 0.83; p = 0.048) between denosumab and placebo. At five years, the intervention groups showed less y-translation (subsidence) than placebo: mean difference of 0.50 mm for zoledronate (95% CI 0.23 to 0.78; p < 0.001) and 0.30 mm for denosumab (95% CI 0.03 to 0.58; p = 0.031). CTX was lower in the zoledronate group than in the placebo group at two- and six-week follow-up. In the denosumab group, CTX was lower until one year postoperatively. P1NP were similar in the placebo and zoledronate groups, but lower in the denosumab group up to one year postoperatively. Periprosthetic BMD was higher in intervention groups, with a lasting effect in the zoledronate group at five years. Conclusion Both interventions decreased cementless tibial implant migration by suppressing bone resorption. Local zoledronate had a lasting mitigating effect on subsidence and the periprosthetic BMD. Our findings support the use of local intraoperative zoledronate during knee arthroplasty surgery to improve cementless tibial implant fixation and preserve tibial bone. However, multicentre studies and prospective cohort quality studies should be performed for confirmation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(8):793–803.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI