Injectable angiotensinogen inhibition therapy for hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction Hypertension is the leading risk factor worldwide for cardiovascular mortality, and the development of kidney disease. Management of hypertension involves multiple approaches that involve daily tablet ingestion, with high rates of non-adherence. There is an unmet need for innovative interventions to improve adherence to treatment. Purpose We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the role of injectable angiotensinogen (AGT) inhibitors, such as Zilebesiran and IONIS-AGT-LRx, in the treatment of hypertension. Methods PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing injectable AGT inhibitors versus placebo. Efficacy was assessed through mean changes in angiotensinogen, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). We also examined safety endpoints. We computed pooled mean differences (MD) or risk ratios (RR) for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively, under a random-effects model with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Four studies were included for a total of 512 patients, of whom 279 (54.5%) were male, with a mean age of 57 years old; 349 (68.2%) were white. The mean baseline SBP was 142 ± 19.9 mmHg. In a pooled analysis, mean change of AGT decreased significantly with injectable AGT inhibitor compared with placebo (MD -77.86 %; 95% CI -107.49 to -48.23; p<0.01). Similarly, mean change in SBP (MD -14.15 mmHg; 95% CI -19.53 to -8.78; p=0.30) and DBP (MD -8.49 mmHg; 95% CI -9.98 to -7.00; p=0.78) were also significantly lower in the injectable AGT inhibitor group compared with placebo. AGT inhibitors were well tolerated, without associations with serious adverse events, adverse events related to discontinuation, death, hyperkalaemia, or hypotension. However, there was an increase in injection site reaction with these agents compared with placebo (RR 5.86; 95% CI 1.14 to 30.17; p=0.83). Conclusions In this meta-analysis of RCTs, injectable AGT inhibitors were associated with a significant decrease in mean AGT, SBP, and DBP as compared with placebo. There were no significant differences between groups in serious adverse events, although injection site reaction was more common in patients treated with injectable AGT inhibitors.Forest plot of mean change in SBP