Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 Extension

扩展(谓词逻辑) 计算机科学 医学 程序设计语言
作者
Nancy J. Butcher,Andrea Monsour,Emma J. Mew,A.-W. Chan,David Moher,Evan Mayo‐Wilson,Caroline B. Terwee,Alyssandra Chee-A-Tow,Akira Baba,F. Gavin,Jeremy Grimshaw,Lauren E. Kelly,Leena Saeed,L. Thabane,Lisa Askie,Michael B. Smith,Mufiza Farid‐Kapadia,Paula Williamson,Péter Szatmári,Peter Tugwell
出处
期刊:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Carolina Digital Repository [University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]
被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.17615/qmfe-d759
摘要

Importance: Complete information in a trial protocol regarding study outcomes is crucial for obtaining regulatory approvals, ensuring standardized trial conduct, reducing research waste, and providing transparency of methods to facilitate trial replication, critical appraisal, accurate reporting and interpretation of trial results, and knowledge synthesis. However, recommendations on what outcome-specific information should be included are diverse and inconsistent. To improve reporting practices promoting transparent and reproducible outcome selection, assessment, and analysis, a need for specific and harmonized guidance as to what outcome-specific information should be addressed in clinical trial protocols exists. Objective: To develop harmonized, evidence- and consensus-based standards for describing outcomes in clinical trial protocols through integration with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 statement. Evidence Review: Using the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) methodological framework, the SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 extension of the SPIRIT 2013 statement was developed by (1) generation and evaluation of candidate outcome reporting items via consultation with experts and a scoping review of existing guidance for reporting trial outcomes (published within the 10 years prior to March 19, 2018) identified through expert solicitation, electronic database searches of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Methodology Register, gray literature searches, and reference list searches; (2) a 3-round international Delphi voting process (November 2018-February 2019) completed by 124 panelists from 22 countries to rate and identify additional items; and (3) an in-person consensus meeting (April 9-10, 2019) attended by 25 panelists to identify essential items for outcome-specific reporting to be addressed in clinical trial protocols. Findings: The scoping review and consultation with experts identified 108 recommendations relevant to outcome-specific reporting to be addressed in trial protocols, the majority (72%) of which were not included in the SPIRIT 2013 statement. All recommendations were consolidated into 56 items for Delphi voting; after the Delphi survey process, 19 items met criteria for further evaluation at the consensus meeting and possible inclusion in the SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 extension. The discussions during and after the consensus meeting yielded 9 items that elaborate on the SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist items and are related to completely defining and justifying the choice of primary, secondary, and other outcomes (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 12) prospectively in the trial protocol, defining and justifying the target difference between treatment groups for the primary outcome used in the sample size calculations (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 14), describing the responsiveness of the study instruments used to assess the outcome and providing details on the outcome assessors (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 18a), and describing any planned methods to account for multiplicity relating to the analyses or interpretation of the results (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 20a). Conclusions and Relevance: This SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 extension of the SPIRIT 2013 statement provides 9 outcome-specific items that should be addressed in all trial protocols and may help increase trial utility, replicability, and transparency and may minimize the risk of selective nonreporting of trial results.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
xiaoshuwang发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
HW应助yjo采纳,获得10
1秒前
你好啊完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Lsw发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
哭泣啤酒完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
小蘑菇应助safeheart采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研通AI6.4应助蓝莓果采纳,获得10
2秒前
CodeCraft应助柠檬贝果采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
wen完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
小乐完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
四叶草发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
2150号发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
ZHANGZQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
丘比特应助jiayin采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
wanci应助小轩子采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
科研小白完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
tuyfytjt发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Jasper应助超帅的dz采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
田様应助ww采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
fjhsg25发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
ASDS完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
房正完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
8秒前
sw发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
huimin完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
杰杰小杰完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7763101
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9307715
关于积分的说明 20302145
捐赠科研通 7347723
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3313857
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2463699
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2328110