Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 Extension

扩展(谓词逻辑) 计算机科学 医学 程序设计语言
作者
Nancy J. Butcher,Andrea Monsour,Emma J. Mew,A.-W. Chan,David Moher,Evan Mayo‐Wilson,Caroline B. Terwee,Alyssandra Chee-A-Tow,Akira Baba,F. Gavin,Jeremy Grimshaw,Lauren E. Kelly,Leena Saeed,L. Thabane,Lisa Askie,Michael B. Smith,Mufiza Farid‐Kapadia,Paula Williamson,Péter Szatmári,Peter Tugwell
出处
期刊:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - Carolina Digital Repository 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.17615/qmfe-d759
摘要

Importance: Complete information in a trial protocol regarding study outcomes is crucial for obtaining regulatory approvals, ensuring standardized trial conduct, reducing research waste, and providing transparency of methods to facilitate trial replication, critical appraisal, accurate reporting and interpretation of trial results, and knowledge synthesis. However, recommendations on what outcome-specific information should be included are diverse and inconsistent. To improve reporting practices promoting transparent and reproducible outcome selection, assessment, and analysis, a need for specific and harmonized guidance as to what outcome-specific information should be addressed in clinical trial protocols exists. Objective: To develop harmonized, evidence- and consensus-based standards for describing outcomes in clinical trial protocols through integration with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 statement. Evidence Review: Using the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) methodological framework, the SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 extension of the SPIRIT 2013 statement was developed by (1) generation and evaluation of candidate outcome reporting items via consultation with experts and a scoping review of existing guidance for reporting trial outcomes (published within the 10 years prior to March 19, 2018) identified through expert solicitation, electronic database searches of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Methodology Register, gray literature searches, and reference list searches; (2) a 3-round international Delphi voting process (November 2018-February 2019) completed by 124 panelists from 22 countries to rate and identify additional items; and (3) an in-person consensus meeting (April 9-10, 2019) attended by 25 panelists to identify essential items for outcome-specific reporting to be addressed in clinical trial protocols. Findings: The scoping review and consultation with experts identified 108 recommendations relevant to outcome-specific reporting to be addressed in trial protocols, the majority (72%) of which were not included in the SPIRIT 2013 statement. All recommendations were consolidated into 56 items for Delphi voting; after the Delphi survey process, 19 items met criteria for further evaluation at the consensus meeting and possible inclusion in the SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 extension. The discussions during and after the consensus meeting yielded 9 items that elaborate on the SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist items and are related to completely defining and justifying the choice of primary, secondary, and other outcomes (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 12) prospectively in the trial protocol, defining and justifying the target difference between treatment groups for the primary outcome used in the sample size calculations (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 14), describing the responsiveness of the study instruments used to assess the outcome and providing details on the outcome assessors (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 18a), and describing any planned methods to account for multiplicity relating to the analyses or interpretation of the results (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 20a). Conclusions and Relevance: This SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 extension of the SPIRIT 2013 statement provides 9 outcome-specific items that should be addressed in all trial protocols and may help increase trial utility, replicability, and transparency and may minimize the risk of selective nonreporting of trial results.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
科研通AI2S应助susu采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
peterwang35完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
若宫伊芙应助Rookie采纳,获得10
2秒前
temp应助Rookie采纳,获得10
2秒前
xie老板完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
4秒前
阳光不弱发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
gaga发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
大段儿发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Y.J发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
包包酱完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
赵泰完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
promise完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
tong完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
yu发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
大个应助爱沉淀的太阳花采纳,获得10
7秒前
现代孤萍发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
pluto应助朱颜采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
陆乐完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
酷波er应助科研公主采纳,获得10
10秒前
在水一方应助甜屿采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
qwfwe发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
克里斯蒂娜完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
怕黑访云完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
稳重的自行车完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
lh发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
Prescott's Microbiology: 2026 Release ISE 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
Cronologia da história de Macau 5000
Environmental Leverage in Times of Climate Crisis: Product Standards, Carbon Border Measures and Preferential Trade Agreements 1000
Interactions of Vowel Quality and Prosody in East Slavic 1000
Erwählung und Berufung bei Paulus: Bedeutung, Entwicklung und Funktion einer Vorstellung in ihrem frühjüdischen und griechisch-römischen Kontext 850
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7153441
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8798588
关于积分的说明 18594290
捐赠科研通 6752520
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3160516
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2294104
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2135114