A Comparison of Surgical Approaches for Hip Hemiarthroplasty Performed for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture

医学 四分位间距 荟萃分析 股骨颈 随机对照试验 外科 髋部骨折 梅德林 入射(几何) 系统回顾 内科学 骨质疏松症 物理 光学 政治学 法学
作者
Charles Gusho,Wayne Hoskins,Elie Ghanem
出处
期刊:Jbjs reviews [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:12 (6) 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.2106/jbjs.rvw.24.00067
摘要

Background: Multiple hemiarthroplasty (HA) approaches exist for femoral neck fracture (FNF) treatment. However, there is no consensus on the superiority of one approach for postoperative outcomes. This study assessed outcomes among randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the posterior approach (PA), direct lateral approach (DLA), anterolateral approach (ALA), and the direct anterior approach (DAA) in HA for FNF. Methods: PubMed, Ovid/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried in February 2024. A frequentist model network meta-analysis of eligible prospective RCTs compared outcomes among approaches using P-scores. Results: Of 1,481 retrieved studies, 11 RCTs totaling 1,513 FNF patients who underwent HA through a PA (n = 446; 29.5%), DLA (n = 481; 31.8%), ALA (n = 296; 19.6%), or DAA (n = 290; 19.2%) with median (interquartile range) follow-up of 6 (4.5-12.0) months were included for meta-analysis. DAA was associated with statistically increased operative duration (mean difference [MD], 1.89 minutes; 95% CI, 0.08 to 3.69 minutes; p < 0.001) compared with a PA, whereas an ALA was associated with statistically greater blood loss compared with a PA (MD, 5.81 mL; 95% CI, 4.11 to 7.50 mL; p < 0.001). There were no differences in the incidence of fracture, dislocation, infection, complications, revision, nor 1-year mortality among approaches. There were also no differences in hip nor pain score improvement at latest follow-up, although with high heterogeneity (I 2 = 85.7% and 94.2%, respectively). Conclusion: This study found no clinical difference in improvement in pain, function, nor in revision outcomes and operative characteristics among HA approaches for FNF, and each approach had a similar adverse event profile. Despite limited randomized evidence, these findings suggest comparable short-term efficacy and safety of all approaches. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
慕青应助屿若采纳,获得50
1秒前
liekkas完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
曾经如冬完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
科研通AI2S应助lu采纳,获得10
1秒前
朴实的之云完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
学不会发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Jm发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
luozejun完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
英俊的铭应助光亮芷天采纳,获得10
6秒前
所所应助yongen采纳,获得10
6秒前
LMFP完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
liushiyi完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
TXX完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
浮游应助machenchen采纳,获得10
11秒前
ll完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
蛋肠加蛋应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
11秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
11秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
小郭完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
子车茗应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
12秒前
朝暮应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
Akim应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
子车茗应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
12秒前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Zeolites: From Fundamentals to Emerging Applications 1500
Encyclopedia of Materials: Plastics and Polymers 1000
Architectural Corrosion and Critical Infrastructure 1000
Early Devonian echinoderms from Victoria (Rhombifera, Blastoidea and Ophiocistioidea) 1000
Hidden Generalizations Phonological Opacity in Optimality Theory 1000
Handbook of Social and Emotional Learning, Second Edition 900
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4919200
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4191250
关于积分的说明 13016705
捐赠科研通 3961572
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2171732
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1189693
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1098282