医学
内科学
重性抑郁障碍
抗抑郁药
荟萃分析
相对风险
安慰剂
萧条(经济学)
置信区间
随机对照试验
临床试验
精神科
替代医学
病理
海马体
扁桃形结构
经济
宏观经济学
作者
Ole Köhler‐Forsberg,Cecilie N. Lydholm,Carsten Hjorthøj,Merete Nordentoft,Ole Mors,Michael E. Benros
摘要
Background No study has gathered evidence from all randomized clinical trials ( RCT s) with anti‐inflammatory drugs measuring antidepressant effects including a detailed assessment of side‐effects and bias. Methods We performed a systematic review identifying RCT s published prior to January 1, 2018, studying antidepressant treatment effects and side‐effects of pharmacological anti‐inflammatory intervention in adults with major depressive disorder ( MDD ) or depressive symptoms. Outcomes were depression scores after treatment, remission, response, and side‐effects. Pooled standard mean differences ( SMD ) and risk ratios ( RR ) including 95% confidence intervals (95%‐ CI ) were calculated. Results We identified 36 RCT s, whereof 13 investigated NSAID s ( N = 4214), 9 cytokine inhibitors ( N = 3345), seven statins ( N = 1576), 3 minocycline ( N = 151), 2 pioglitazone ( N = 77), and 2 glucocorticoids (N = 59). Anti‐inflammatory agents improved depressive symptoms compared to placebo as add‐on in patients with MDD ( SMD = −0.64; 95%‐ CI = −0.88, −0.40; I 2 = 51%; N = 597) and as monotherapy ( SMD = −0.41; 95%‐ CI = −0.60, −0.22; I 2 = 93%, N = 8825). Anti‐inflammatory add‐on improved response ( RR = 1.76; 95%‐ CI = 1.44–2.16; I 2 = 16%; N = 341) and remission ( RR = 2.14; 95%‐ CI = 1.03–4.48; I 2 = 57%; N = 270). We found a trend toward an increased risk for infections, and all studies showed high risk of bias. Conclusion Anti‐inflammatory agents improved antidepressant treatment effects. Future RCT s need to include longer follow‐up, identify optimal doses and subgroups of patients that can benefit from anti‐inflammatory intervention.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI