Appraisal of national and international uterine fibroid management guidelines: a systematic review

指南 医学 醋酸乌利司他 子宫肌瘤 梅德林 模式 系统回顾 循证医学 妇科 家庭医学 医学物理学 替代医学 人口 病理 政治学 环境卫生 研究方法 计划生育 法学 社会学 社会科学
作者
Abena S. Amoah,Nitin Joseph,Sophie Reap,SD Quinn
出处
期刊:Bjog: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology [Wiley]
卷期号:129 (3): 356-364 被引量:25
标识
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.16928
摘要

Background Guidelines standardise high‐quality evidence‐based management strategies for clinicians. Uterine fibroids are a highly prevalent condition and may exert significant morbidity. Objectives To appraise national and international uterine fibroid guidelines using the validated AGREE‐II instrument. Selection strategy Database search of PubMed and EMBASE from inception to October 2020 for all published English‐language uterine fibroid clinical practice guidelines. Data collection and analysis In all, 939 abstracts were screened for eligibility by two reviewers independently. Three reviewers used the AGREE‐II instrument to assess guideline quality in six domains. Recommendations were mapped to allow a narrative synthesis regarding areas of consensus and disagreement. Main results Eight national guidelines (AAGL, SOGC 2014, ACOG, ACR, SOGC 2019, CNGOF, ASRM and SOGC 2015) and one international guideline (RANZOG) were appraised. The highest scoring guideline was RANZOG 2001(score 56.5%). None of the guidelines met the a priori criteria for being high‐quality overall (score ≥66%). There were 166 recommendations across guidelines. There were several areas of disagreement and uncertainty. There were only three areas of consensus. Supporting evidence was not evident for many recommendations; 27.7% of recommendations were based on expert opinion only. Conclusions There is a need for high‐quality guidelines on fibroids given their heterogeneity across individuals and the large range of treatment modalities available. There are also areas of controversy in the management of fibroids (e.g. Ulipristal acetate, power morcellation), which should also be addressed in any guidelines. Future guidelines should be methodologically robust to allow high‐quality decision‐making regarding fibroid treatments. Tweetable abstract Current national fibroid guidelines have deficiencies in quality when appraised using the validated AGREE instrument.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
海贼王的男人完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
蛋肠加蛋发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
JasonChan完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
糟糕的夏波完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
星辰大海应助Dky采纳,获得10
8秒前
涯123发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
QAQSS完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
Aiden完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
提莫将军发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
xiaoguai完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
共享精神应助蛋肠加蛋采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
阿颦完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
张春梦紫完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
zcw完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
小肥肉发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Pighasadream完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
张春梦紫发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
刘Alice完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
留胡子的寄瑶完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
涯123完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
田田完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
jiunuan完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
tangtang完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
暮商完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
24秒前
ding应助刘大大采纳,获得10
24秒前
晴枫3648发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
刘Alice发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
小二郎应助小肥肉采纳,获得10
24秒前
kuailexianchi完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
YTTT完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
28秒前
29秒前
dyd完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
高分求助中
Psychopathic Traits and Quality of Prison Life 1000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 660
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6451376
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8263329
关于积分的说明 17607439
捐赠科研通 5516185
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2903669
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1880634
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1722651