布地奈德
丙酸氟替卡松
氟替卡松
医学
安慰剂
皮质类固醇
鼻腔给药
鼻喷雾剂
生活质量(医疗保健)
内科学
鼻孔
麻醉
胃肠病学
鼻子
外科
药理学
病理
护理部
替代医学
作者
Giorgio Ciprandi,Giorgio Walter Canonica,M. Grosclaude,J. Ostinelli,Giancarlo Brazzola,Jean Bousquet
出处
期刊:Allergy
[Wiley]
日期:2002-07-01
卷期号:57 (7): 586-591
被引量:67
标识
DOI:10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.03228.x
摘要
Background: Intranasal glucocorticosteroids are effective in seasonal allergic rhinitis. This study compared the efficacy of budesonide (Rhinocort ®Turbuhaler®) and fluticasone propionate (Flixonase®) in this respect. Methods: Patients ( n = 280) were randomized to receive budesonide, 140 µg (delivered dose) once daily, fluticasone, 200 µg once daily, or matching placebos for 5 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in combined nasal symptom (nasal blockage, runny nose, sneezing) scores. Quality of life was measured in 121 patients by means of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and the Short‐form Health Survey (SF‐36). Results: Both steroids significantly reduced combined nasal symptoms, compared with placebo. There was no significant difference between the two treatments. Substantial or total symptom control was achieved in 89.9% of the budesonide‐treated patients, compared with 88.7% with fluticasone and 42.7% with placebo. Four of the five domains of the RQLQ were significantly improved with budesonide, whereas with fluticasone only two domains were improved. Budesonide significantly improved scores in five out of eight domains of the SF‐36, whereas no domains were improved with fluticasone. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in efficacy between budesonide and fluticasone in this study. However, greater improvements in quality of life were seen with budesonide than with fluticasone.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI