Review of the effect of amylase-resistant dysphagia products on swallowing safety

Purpose of review Thickened fluids are a widely utilised compensatory management strategy for people with impaired swallowing (dysphagia). Over recent years there has been a shift in practice to offer gum-based instead of starch-based products. A key marketing message has been that gum-based thickeners with amylase-resistant properties are superior in promoting ‘safer swallowing’. This review sought evidence to evaluate the effect of amylase-resistant products on swallowing safety. Recent findings No studies directly compared the effect of amylase-resistant products with usual care or products without amylase resistance. Five studies cited amylase-resistant properties and compared gum-based to starch-based dysphagia products or thin fluids. Swallowing safety was frequently judged subjectively with rating scales. Swallowing biomechanics were not included and clinically meaningful outcomes, such as incidence of aspiration pneumonia, were not reported. A scoping review of the grey literature found little evidence that amylase-resistant properties of dysphagia products were of significant concern to clinicians or patients. Summary Despite references to the ’importance’ of amylase-resistant properties of dysphagia products there is no evidence that this property improves swallowing safety. Further research is needed using objective and clinically meaningful outcome measures to allow clinicians and patients to make informed decisions for dysphagia management.