New insights on the predictive value of hypoperfusion intensity ratio in thrombectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with multiple cut-offs

Background The hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) has emerged as a vital measure of tissue-level collateral blood flow, helping to identify patients who are likely to benefit from mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aimed to assess the HIR’s predictive accuracy for clinical outcomes following MT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched to identify studies comparing good versus poor HIR groups based on studies’ reported cut-offs. We pooled binary outcomes to calculate odds ratios (OR) and continuous outcomes to calculate mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using random-effects models. PROSPERO registration code: CRD42024609185. Results 14 studies with 2987 patients, 1553 with good HIR and 1434 with poor HIR, were included in this meta-analysis. Patients with poor HIR exhibited a significantly higher baseline infarct volume compared with those with good HIR (MD 30.6 mL, 95% CI 20.8 mL to 40.3 mL, P<0.01), though baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (P=0.12) and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) (P=0.35) were comparable between groups. The rates of infarct growth (MD 22.4 mL, 95% CI 6.7 mL to 38.0 mL, P<0.01) and 3-month mortality (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.58, P=0.04) were higher among the poor HIR group and good functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale 0–2 at 3 months) was lower (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.80, P<0.01). The rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P=0.37) and successful reperfusion (P=0.47) were comparable among groups. Conclusion This meta-analysis highlights the significant negative impact of poor HIR on patient outcomes. These findings emphasize the need for personalized treatment strategies for patients with poor HIR.