Making Community-Based Palliative Care Eligibility Determinations: Palliative Care Team Member Perspectives on Access to Information and Algorithm Use

缓和医疗 医学 医疗保健 护理部 家庭医学 梅德林 治疗性护理 门诊护理 政治学 法学 经济 经济增长
作者
Kira G Sheldon,Kathryn H. Bowles,C. Frank Sage,June Stanley,Elizabeth A. Luth
出处
期刊:American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine [SAGE Publishing]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1177/10499091241302044
摘要

Background: Seriously ill older adults have high risk of mortality, symptom burden, and compromised functional status, and may benefit from community-based palliative care (“palliative care”). However, identifying potentially eligible individuals is challenging. Objectives: Identify how a palliative care team makes eligibility determinations, including the use of a mortality risk algorithm. Design: Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with palliative care providers to understand how health information is used to assess Medicare Advantage plan patients’ eligibility for palliative care. Transcripts were analyzed to identify categories related to how participants used health information in making eligibility determinations. Setting/participants: All outreach and care management team members and nurse practitioners (n = 7) working for a palliative care program at a not-for-profit health care agency. Results: The palliative care team used information on symptoms, diagnoses, and acute care utilization when making eligibility determinations. The algorithm generated lists of potentially eligible patients but was deemed not useful because it provided limited information about current health status and was not well integrated into existing health record systems. Participants would like information to be current, detailed, and presented in one location. Conclusions: Palliative care team members used a variety of indicators of unmet care needs to make eligibility determinations. A mortality risk algorithm to identify potentially eligible patients was insufficiently detailed to be useful in final eligibility determinations. These findings provide insights into how health data can be presented to better integrate health information from mortality risk algorithms into existing workflows to support palliative care eligibility decision making.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
嘻嘻完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
ggb发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Shawna发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
鹿鸣完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
cdercder应助hanghang采纳,获得10
5秒前
77完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
搜文献的北北完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
可爱的函函应助677采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
glowe完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
赵琼君完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
11秒前
牛X发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
热情煎饼发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
隐形曼青应助过眼云烟采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
zzz发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
Ava应助南枳采纳,获得10
17秒前
在水一方应助明泽额尔顿采纳,获得10
18秒前
璨澄完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
JamesPei应助羞涩的寒松采纳,获得10
19秒前
xn发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7758651
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9304563
关于积分的说明 20281533
捐赠科研通 7342400
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3312257
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2462832
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2326174