Efficacy and Safety of Biologics for Oral Corticosteroid–Dependent Asthma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

医学 苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 美波利祖马布 哮喘 安慰剂 不利影响 内科学 随机对照试验 皮质类固醇 嗜酸性粒细胞 病理 替代医学
作者
Phichayut Phinyo,Thanachit Krikeerati,Irin Vichara-Anont,Torpong Thongngarm
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice [Elsevier]
卷期号:12 (2): 409-420 被引量:17
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.007
摘要

Background

A maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) in addition to high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β2-agonists in patients with severe asthma leads to long-term adverse events. Oral corticosteroid–sparing agents are of high priority.

Objective

This network meta-analysis assessed biologics' comparative efficacy and safety in OCS-dependent patients with asthma.

Methods

We performed a systematic search through PubMed, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane Center of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials that addressed the efficacy and safety of biologics compared with placebo in OCS-dependent patients with asthma from inception to July 2023. The primary outcome was an overall reduction in the OCS dose while asthma control was maintained.

Results

We included seven randomized controlled trials involving 1,052 OCS-dependent patients with asthma. Compared with placebo, benralizumab every 8 weeks, benralizumab every 4 weeks, dupilumab, and mepolizumab were efficacious in achieving a reduction in the OCS dose with low to moderate confidence (odds ratio [95% CI]: 4.12 [2.22-7.64]; 4.09 [2.22-7.55]; 3.25 [1.90-5.55]; and 2.39 [1.25-4.57], respectively) whereas tralokinumab, tezepelumab, and subcutaneous reslizumab were ineffective. An indirect comparison found no significant differences among benralizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab. Efficacy in reducing exacerbations was consistent with the primary analysis. High baseline blood eosinophil counts benefit from anti–IL-5 therapies, whereas high FeNO levels favor dupilumab regardless of blood eosinophil counts. Adverse events between biologics and placebo were comparable, except for eosinophilia with dupilumab.

Conclusions

In OCS-dependent patients with asthma, benralizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab were superior to placebo in reducing the OCS dose. Evaluating baseline biomarkers helps in choosing the proper biologics to maximize treatment effects.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
秦铭阳发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
自由的安白完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
daisy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
充电宝应助锦鲤采纳,获得10
2秒前
认真的雨琴完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
今后应助keyandog采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
lybae完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
负责雨安发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
hhh完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
cruise完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
小汁儿完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
捡鹅卵石的笨蛋完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
百川完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
叶子发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
秦铭阳完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
sairai发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
lkkkkk完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
上官追命举报炙热静白求助涉嫌违规
11秒前
12秒前
所所应助打工人采纳,获得10
12秒前
想月亮想饿了完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
大意的孤晴完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
ZJW发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
开心的又夏完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
妥协发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
fx完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1000
The Composition and Relative Chronology of Dynasties 16 and 17 in Egypt 1000
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
Real World Research, 5th Edition 800
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5712999
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5213045
关于积分的说明 15269140
捐赠科研通 4864791
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2611645
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1561939
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1519153