材料科学
锂(药物)
磷酸铁锂
热失控
钴
磷酸盐
磷酸铁
氧化钴
锰
镍
电池(电)
锂钴氧化物
磷酸钒锂电池
无机化学
氧化铁
阴极
储能
化学工程
氧化物
氢
碱性电池
热的
氧化镍
铸铁
冶金
热分析
作者
Kai Chen,Dian Zhang,Xin Shen,Xuning Feng,Xin‐Bing Cheng,Yuping Wu
标识
DOI:10.1002/aenm.202503248
摘要
Abstract Lithium iron phosphate is generally considered to be one of the most thermally stable cathode materials for commercial lithium‐ion batteries, while emerging thermal safety characteristics rise with the large‐capacity lithium‐ion batteries in large‐scale stationary energy storage power stations. In this review, different safety risks of lithium iron phosphate batteries compared with lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide batteries from the view of general features of thermal runaway and the content of extremely dangerous hydrogen are discussed, especially the emerging thermal safety characteristics for large‐capacity lithium‐ion batteries. First, the prevailing belief that lithium iron phosphate is safer than lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide is discussed based on the general features of thermal runaway, including characteristic temperature, heat generation, mass loss, and combustion possibility. Second, the rising viewpoint that the hydrogen content in the thermal runaway of lithium iron phosphate batteries is higher than that of lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide batteries is examined. More importantly, different thermal behaviors are strongly related to the battery capacity (ampere hour). Additionally, the solutions to reduce hydrogen generation in lithium‐ion batteries are presented in the outlook. This review presents comprehensive insights into the thermal safety behaviors of the commercial lithium‐ion batteries with lithium iron phosphate cathodes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI