清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Patient-reported outcomes, weight loss, and remission of type 2 diabetes 3 years after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy (Oseberg); a single-centre, randomised controlled trial

医学 袖状胃切除术 2型糖尿病 减肥 糖尿病 外科 人口 随机对照试验 糖化血红素 随机化 内科学 胃旁路手术 肥胖 胃分流术 环境卫生 内分泌学
作者
Marius Svanevik,Jolanta Lorentzen,Heidi Borgeraas,Rune Sandbu,Birgitte Seip,Asle W. Medhus,Jens Kristoffer Hertel,Ronette L. Kolotkin,Milada Cvancarova Småstuen,Dag Hofsø,Jøran Hjelmesæth
出处
期刊:The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:11 (8): 555-566 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00127-4
摘要

Little is known about the comparative effects of various bariatric procedures on patient-reported outcomes. We aimed to compare 3-year effects of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on patient-reported outcome measures in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes.The Oseberg trial was a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised trial at Vestfold Hospital Trust, a public tertiary obesity centre in Tønsberg, Norway. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with previously verified BMI 35·0 kg/m2 or greater. Diabetes was diagnosed if glycated haemoglobin was at least 6·5% (48 mmol/mol) or by their use of anti-diabetic medications with glycated haemoglobin at least 6·1% (43 mmol/mol). Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. All patients received identical preoperative and postoperative treatment. Randomisation was done with a computerised random number generator and a block size of ten. Study personnel, patients, and the primary outcome assessor were blinded to allocations for 1 year. The prespecified secondary outcomes reported here were 3-year changes in several clinically important patient-reported outcomes, weight loss, and diabetes remission. Analyses were done in the intention to treat population. This trial is ongoing, closed to recruitment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01778738.Between Oct 15, 2012 and Sept 1, 2017, 319 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes scheduled for bariatric surgery were assessed for eligibility. 101 patients were not eligible (29 did not have type 2 diabetes according to inclusion criteria and 72 other exclusion criteria) and 93 declined to participate. 109 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to sleeve gastrectomy (n=55) or gastric bypass (n=54). 72 (66%) of 109 patients were female and 37 (34%) were male. 104 (95%) of patients were White. 16 patients were lost to follow up and 93 (85%) patients completed the 3-year follow-up. Three additional patients were contacted by phone for registration of comorbidities Compared with sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass was associated with a greater improvement in weight-related quality of life (between group difference 9·4, 95% CI 3·3 to 15·5), less reflux symptoms (0·54, 0·17 to -0·90), greater total bodyweight loss (8% difference, 25% vs 17%), and a higher probability of diabetes remission (67% vs 33%, risk ratio 2·00; 95% CI 1·27 to 3·14). Five patients reported postprandial hypoglycaemia in the third year after gastric bypass versus none after sleeve-gastrectomy (p=0·059). Symptoms of abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhoea, dumping syndrome, depression, binge eating, and appetitive drive did not differ between groups.At 3 years, gastric bypass was superior to sleeve gastrectomy in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity regarding weight related quality of life, reflux symptoms, weight loss, and remission of diabetes, while symptoms of abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhoea, dumping, depression and binge eating did not differ between groups. This new patient-reported knowledge can be used in the shared decision-making process to inform patients about similarities and differences between expected outcomes after the two surgical procedures.Morbid Obesity Centre, Vestfold Hospital Trust.For the Norwegian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
微卫星不稳定完成签到 ,获得积分0
4秒前
14秒前
大个应助飞翔的企鹅采纳,获得10
22秒前
飞翔的企鹅完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
44秒前
tdtk发布了新的文献求助30
47秒前
研一小刘发布了新的文献求助10
51秒前
花海完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
瑾沫流年完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
炳灿完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
凝天完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
ss发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
chenzhuod完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
搜集达人应助ss采纳,获得10
1分钟前
sci_zt完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
小张不哭发布了新的文献求助30
2分钟前
耐冬树发布了新的文献求助200
2分钟前
席江海完成签到,获得积分0
2分钟前
科研通AI2S应助杨惠子采纳,获得10
2分钟前
xfy完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
凝天关注了科研通微信公众号
3分钟前
3分钟前
杨惠子发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
凝天发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
酷波er应助小张不哭采纳,获得10
3分钟前
4分钟前
tdtk发布了新的文献求助30
4分钟前
bbbfx发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
慕青应助tdtk采纳,获得10
4分钟前
bbbfx完成签到,获得积分20
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
xun完成签到,获得积分20
5分钟前
wk完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
SOFT MATTER SERIES Volume 22 Soft Matter in Foods 1000
Zur lokalen Geoidbestimmung aus terrestrischen Messungen vertikaler Schweregradienten 1000
Circulating tumor DNA from blood and cerebrospinal fluid in DLBCL: simultaneous evaluation of mutations, IG rearrangement, and IG clonality 500
Food Microbiology - An Introduction (5th Edition) 500
A Systemic-Functional Study of Language Choice in Singapore 400
Architectural Corrosion and Critical Infrastructure 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4870607
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4161048
关于积分的说明 12902446
捐赠科研通 3916385
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2150831
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1169112
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1072635