Synchronous Carotid Endarterectomy and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft versus Staged Carotid Artery Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft for Patients with Concomitant Severe Coronary and Carotid Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

外科 冲程(发动机)
作者
Stefanos Giannopoulos,Pavlos Texakalidis,Nektarios Charisis,Anil Kumar Jonnalagadda,Nikolaos Chaitidis,Spyridon Giannopoulos,Christos Kaskoutis,Theofilos Machinis,George J. Koullias
出处
期刊:Annals of Vascular Surgery [Elsevier]
卷期号:62: 463- 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2019.06.018
摘要

Background Owing to the systemic nature of atherosclerosis, medium and large arteries at different sites are commonly simultaneously affected. As a result, severe coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) frequently coexists with significant carotid stenosis that warrants revascularization. The aim of this study was to compare synchronous carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and CABG vs. staged carotid artery stenting (CAS) and CABG for patients with concomitant CAD and carotid artery stenosis in terms of perioperative (30-day) outcomes. Methods This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane until July 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random-effects model. The I-square statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Results Five studies comprising 16,712 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Perioperative stroke (odds ratio [OR]: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–1.64; I2 = 39.1%), transient ischemic attack (TIA; OR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.04–2.67; I2 = 27.6%), and myocardial infarction (MI) rates (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.08–3.85; I2 = 68.9%) were similar between the two groups. However, patients who underwent simultaneous CEA and CABG were at a statistically significant higher risk for perioperative mortality (OR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.05–3.06; I2 = 0.0%). Conclusions The current meta-analysis did not detect statistically significant differences in the rates of perioperative stroke, TIA, and MI between the groups. However, patients in the simultaneous CEA and CABG group had a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality. Future randomized trials or prospective cohorts are needed to validate our results.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Yang完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
hong发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
周同庆发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
3秒前
管恩杰完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
小离心机完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小马甲应助眯眯眼的不斜采纳,获得10
5秒前
123456完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
赘婿应助时光倒流ltt采纳,获得10
7秒前
ENG发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
传奇3应助Yang采纳,获得10
8秒前
从容芮应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
ninini应助科研通管家采纳,获得100
9秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
小马甲应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
9秒前
9秒前
prof.zhang发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
倩迷谜举报舒服的如蓉求助涉嫌违规
11秒前
14秒前
丘比特应助康康采纳,获得10
14秒前
火星上觅秋完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Patience发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
17秒前
勤劳傻姑发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
斯文败类应助MY.Y采纳,获得10
17秒前
Ava应助阿尔卑斯采纳,获得10
19秒前
拉稀摆带完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
lepei发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
CKJ完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
小橘子完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
zzzzzzz完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Plesiosaur extinction cycles; events that mark the beginning, middle and end of the Cretaceous 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 440
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 400
薩提亞模式團體方案對青年情侶輔導效果之研究 400
3X3 Basketball: Everything You Need to Know 310
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2386936
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2093434
关于积分的说明 5267975
捐赠科研通 1820104
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 907942
版权声明 559236
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 484991