预热
医学
随机对照试验
物理疗法
胃切除术
临床试验
人口
癌症
术前护理
内科学
外科
新辅助治疗
模式治疗法
前瞻性队列研究
年轻人
腹部外科
梅德林
作者
Yifan Sun,Yulong Tian,Shougen Cao,Lei Li,Wenbin Yu,Yinlu Ding,Xixun Wang,Ying Kong,X. Wang,Hao Wang,Xizeng Hui,Jianjun Qu,Hongbo Wang,Quanhong Duan,Daogui Yang,Huanhu Zhang,Shaofei Zhou,Zheng Lou,Zequn Li,Q Liu
出处
期刊:JAMA Surgery
[American Medical Association]
日期:2026-01-28
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2025.6256
摘要
Importance Frailty is associated with functional decline and increased postoperative morbidity. Prehabilitation may complement Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care to improve patient outcomes. Objective To evaluate the effect of a multimodal prehabilitation program on functional capacity and clinical outcomes in older patients with frailty undergoing radical gastrectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 15 centers in China. Participants aged 65 to 85 years with frailty (Geriatric 8 screening tool score ≤14) scheduled for elective gastrectomy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to elective gastrectomy were randomized 1:1 to ERAS care either with or without prehabilitation. Recruitment for the study began in September 2022 and was completed in April 2024; data analysis was completed from September 2024 to April 2025. Interventions The prehabilitation group (PG) underwent multimodal prehabilitation for at least 2 weeks in combination with ERAS care, while the standard ERAS group (SG) followed a well-defined ERAS pathway. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included functional capacity, surgical resilience, and other short-term postoperative outcomes. Results A total of 368 participants were randomized to either the PG or SG group. In the modified intention-to-treat population of 347 participants (PG: n = 169; SG: n = 178), overall compliance with prehabilitation was 93.75%; median (IQR) participant age was 70 (68-73) years, and 95 participants (27.4%) were female. The rate of complications was lower in PG compared to SG (17.2% vs 28.7%; P = .01). In particular, significant benefits were observed in minor complications (PG: 18 of 169 patients [10.7%]; SG: 36 of 178 patients [20.2%]; P = .01) and medical complications (PG: 14 of 169 patients [8.3%]; SG: 30 of 178 patients [16.9%]; P = .02). The PG showed increased functional capacity before surgery compared to baseline (mean [SD] 6-minute walk test change, +24 [12.5] m; P < .001). Four weeks after surgery, the mean walking distance of the PG remained above baseline levels. Moreover, secondary parameters, such as chronic low-grade inflammation, preoperative physical quality of life, length of intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation time, and length of hospital stay, generally favored prehabilitation compared with standard ERAS care. Conclusions and Relevance Per the results of this randomized clinical trial, a multimodal prehabilitation program may enhance physiological reserve, reduce morbidity, and promote surgical resilience in older patients with frailty undergoing radical gastrectomy. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05352802
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI