故障模式、影响和危害性分析
排名(信息检索)
托普西斯
失效模式及影响分析
模糊逻辑
临界性
可靠性工程
分类
计算机科学
理想溶液
数据挖掘
判断
灵敏度(控制系统)
机器学习
人工智能
工程类
运筹学
算法
物理
电子工程
核物理学
法学
政治学
热力学
作者
Marcello Braglia,Marco Frosolini,Roberto Montanari
摘要
Abstract In this paper, an alternative multi‐attribute decision‐making approach for prioritizing failures in failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) is presented. The technique is specifically intended to overcome some of the limitations concerning the use of the conventional US MIL‐STD‐1629A method. The approach is based on a fuzzy version of the ‘technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution’ (TOPSIS).The use of fuzzy logic theory allows one to avoid the intrinsic difficulty encountered in assessing ‘crisp’ values in terms of the three FMECA parameters, namely chance of failure, chance of non‐detection, and severity. With the proposed approach, the definition of a knowledge base supported by several qualitative rule bases is no longer required. To solve the fundamental question of ranking the final fuzzy criticality value, a particular method of classification is adopted, allowing a fast and efficient sorting of the final outcome. An application to an important Italian domestic appliance manufacturer and a comparison with conventional FMECA are reported to demonstrate the characteristics of the proposed method. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of the fuzzy judgement weights has confirmed that the proposed approach gives a reasonable and robust final priority ranking of the different causes of failure. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI