医学
血栓形成
重症监护医学
梅德林
风险评估
内科学
政治学
计算机安全
计算机科学
法学
标识
DOI:10.1097/mcp.0b013e32833c3d3e
摘要
This review discusses the current status of individual thrombosis risk assessment as an alternative to applying prophylaxis to broad groups in an attempt to simplify the process. Complete assessment is necessary in order to provide the proper type, duration, and intensity of prophylaxis, especially following discharge.The concept of weighting risk factors to obtain a score has been used by some to guide prophylactic decisions for 20 years. This approach was thought to be intuitively correct despite not having been prospectively validated. During the past years, several studies have appeared linking the score to clinically relevant, imaging-proven venous thromboembolism events. In one study, 12.5% of patients with a score higher than 8 developed proven venous thromboembolism events within 60 days postoperatively.The use of this score can suggest appropriate prophylaxis for surgical patients, especially those at high risk following hospital discharge.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI