医学
危险分层
重症监护医学
心理干预
风险评估
医疗保健系统
不利影响
医疗保健
弗雷明翰风险评分
急诊医学
内科学
计算机安全
疾病
精神科
计算机科学
经济
经济增长
作者
Franco Radaelli,Simone Rocchetto,Alessandra Piagnani,Alberto Savino,Dhanai Di Paolo,Giulia Scardino,Silvia Paggi,Emanuele Rondonotti
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101871
摘要
Several scoring systems have been developed for both upper and lower GI bleeding to predict the bleeding severity and discriminate between low-risk patients, who may be suitable for outpatient management, and those who would likely need hospital-based interventions and are at high risk for adverse outcomes. Risk scores created to identify low-risk patients (namely the Glasgow Blatchford Score and the Oakland score) showed very good discriminative performances and their implementation has proven to be effective in reducing hospital admissions and healthcare burden. Conversely, the performances of risk scores in identifying specific adverse events to define high-risk patients are less accurate, and whether their integration into routine clinical practice has a tangible impact on patient management remains unproven. This review describes the existing risk score systems for GI bleeding, emphasizes key research findings, elucidates the circumstances in which their utilization can be beneficial, examines their constraints when considering routine clinical application, and discuss future development.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI