医学
模式治疗法
可靠性(半导体)
心理学
人工智能
计算机科学
量子力学
物理
外科
功率(物理)
作者
Giuliano Lo Bianco,Christopher L. Robinson,Francesco D’Angelo,Marco Cascella,Silvia Natoli,Emanuele Sinagra,Sebastiano Mercadante,Filippo Drago
出处
期刊:Biomedicines
[Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
日期:2025-03-05
卷期号:13 (3): 636-636
标识
DOI:10.3390/biomedicines13030636
摘要
Background: While long-term opioid therapy is a widely utilized strategy for managing chronic pain, many patients have understandable questions and concerns regarding its safety, efficacy, and potential for dependency and addiction. Providing clear, accurate, and reliable information is essential for fostering patient understanding and acceptance. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) applications offer interesting avenues for delivering patient education in healthcare. This study evaluates the reliability, accuracy, and comprehensibility of ChatGPT’s responses to common patient inquiries about opioid long-term therapy. Methods: An expert panel selected thirteen frequently asked questions regarding long-term opioid therapy based on the authors’ clinical experience in managing chronic pain patients and a targeted review of patient education materials. Questions were prioritized based on prevalence in patient consultations, relevance to treatment decision-making, and the complexity of information typically required to address them comprehensively. We assessed comprehensibility by implementing the multimodal generative AI Copilot (Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat). Spanning three domains—pre-therapy, during therapy, and post-therapy—each question was submitted to GPT-4.0 with the prompt “If you were a physician, how would you answer a patient asking…”. Ten pain physicians and two non-healthcare professionals independently assessed the responses using a Likert scale to rate reliability (1–6 points), accuracy (1–3 points), and comprehensibility (1–3 points). Results: Overall, ChatGPT’s responses demonstrated high reliability (5.2 ± 0.6) and good comprehensibility (2.8 ± 0.2), with most answers meeting or exceeding predefined thresholds. Accuracy was moderate (2.7 ± 0.3), with lower performance on more technical topics like opioid tolerance and dependency management. Conclusions: While AI applications exhibit significant potential as a supplementary tool for patient education on opioid long-term therapy, limitations in addressing highly technical or context-specific queries underscore the need for ongoing refinement and domain-specific training. Integrating AI systems into clinical practice should involve collaboration between healthcare professionals and AI developers to ensure safe, personalized, and up-to-date patient education in chronic pain management.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI