克朗巴赫阿尔法
痴呆
照顾负担
医学
比例(比率)
心理弹性
结构效度
收敛有效性
临床心理学
老年学
标准效度
可靠性(半导体)
有效性
横断面研究
家庭照顾者
心理学
心理测量学
内部一致性
社会心理学
疾病
物理
病理
功率(物理)
量子力学
作者
Iris Blotenberg,Alexandra Wuttke,Melanie Boekholt,Kerstin Köhler,Bernhard Holle,Jochen René Thyrian
出处
期刊:BMJ Open
[BMJ]
日期:2025-05-01
卷期号:15 (5): e088738-e088738
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088738
摘要
Objectives The aim of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity (structural and convergent) of the Resilience and Strain Questionnaire in Caregivers of People with Dementia (ResQ-Care-Dem). Design Cross-sectional survey study. Setting Online survey in Germany. Participants The ResQ-Care-Dem was completed by 243 informal caregivers of people with dementia (M age =59.7 years, SD=10.9, 84.8% female). Methods The ResQ-Care-Dem consists of four scales: two resilience scales (psychological aspects and social aspects of resilience) and two burden scales (interpersonal burden and general burden). The reliability of the two resilience and two burden scales was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha as a measure of internal consistency. Structural validity was examined using a principal axis factor analysis. Convergent validity was assessed by Pearson’s correlations with the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-7), the Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale (CES-8) and the Gain in Alzheimer Care Instrument (GAIN). Results The ResQ-Care-Dem scales’ internal consistencies ranged between 0.65 and 0.81. The factorial structure could partly be confirmed, with the items of the four scales primarily loading on four factors. The burden scales demonstrated high and positive correlations with the score for caregiver burden (ZBI-7, r=0.51 – 0.55) and small to high, negative correlations with the scores for caregiver self-efficacy (CES-8, r=–0.52 –0.56) and gains from caregiving (GAIN, r=−0.21 −0.22), supporting construct validity of the scales. The resilience scales showed small to high positive correlations with the scores for caregiver self-efficacy (CES-8, r=0.50 – 0.57) and gains from caregiving (GAIN, r=0.27 – 0.50), as well as moderate negative correlations with the caregiver burden score (ZBI-7, r=−0.45 −0.50), providing evidence for the scales’ construct validity. Conclusions The reliability and structural validity of the ResQ-Care-Dem were partially confirmed. Evidence supporting its convergent validity suggests that the questionnaire has potential as a tool for assessing caregiver burden and resilience factors among informal caregivers of people with dementia. While these findings indicate potential practical applicability, future studies should investigate its performance in real-world settings and assess changes over time (eg, responsiveness) in longitudinal studies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI