头孢呋辛
医学
幽门螺杆菌
内科学
左氧氟沙星
阿莫西林
随机对照试验
胃肠病学
不利影响
意向治疗分析
入射(几何)
抗生素
微生物学
生物
物理
光学
作者
Ji‐Yan Li,Jiepeng Song,Tian Xia,Yunhua Liu,Xiangwu Ding,Lin Ya,Zhenyu Zhang,Hai Zhang,Demin Li,Xiaowei Huang,Yunlian Hu,Li Li,Hongliang Li,Chaoqun Huang,Peiyuan Li
出处
期刊:Helicobacter
[Wiley]
日期:2025-03-01
卷期号:30 (2): e70037-e70037
被引量:1
摘要
ABSTRACT Background High‐Dose Dual Therapy With Amoxicillin Has Shown Advantages to Eradicate Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ), but Not for Penicillin‐Allergic Patients. It Is Recommended That Cefuroxime Could Be an Alternative, but Whether Cefuroxime Could Be Used in Dual Therapy Has Not Been Reported. This Study Aimed to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, and Compliance of Cefuroxime‐Based Dual Therapy ( CDT ) With Cefuroxime‐Based Bismuth Quadruple Therapy ( CQT ) to Treat H. pylori Infection. Materials and Methods The Prospective, Multicenter, Open‐Label, Randomized Controlled Trial Was Conducted to Enroll Patients With Treatment‐Naive H. pylori Infection From 9 Institutions. Patients Were Randomly Assigned to CDT Group (Cefuroxime 500 Mg Three Times/Day and Vonoprazan 20 Mg Twice/Day) or CQT Group (Cefuroxime 500 Mg Twice/Day, Levofloxacin 500 Mg Once/Day, Vonoprazan 20 Mg Twice/Day, and Bismuth 220 Mg Twice/Day), both for 14 Days. Results 700 Patients (350 per Group) Were Enrolled. In the Intention‐To‐Treat Analysis, Eradication Rates Were 76.0% and 86.3% in CDT Group and CQT Group ( P = 0.001). In the Modified Intention‐To‐Treat Analysis, Eradication Rates Were 78.9% and 89.1% ( P < 0.001). In the Per‐Protocol Analysis, Eradication Rates Were 80.2% and 91.2% ( P < 0.001). The Incidence of Adverse Events Was Significantly Lower in CDT Group Than CQT Group (14.4% vs. 29.8%, P < 0.001). Non‐inferiority Was Confirmed Between CDT and CQT Group (All P > 0.025). Compliance Was Good in Both Groups (96.0% vs. 92.8%, P = 0.073). Poor Adherence Was a Risk Factor for Reducing the Efficacy in Both Groups. Conclusions CQT Was More Effective Than CDT for H. pylori Eradication, Which Might Be Recommended for Penicillin‐Allergic Patients. If There Were Contraindications or Intolerance of CQT , CDT Would Be an Alternative. Trail Registration ChiCTR2300071210
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI