杠杆(统计)
概念框架
相关性(法律)
背景(考古学)
功能(生物学)
心理学
公共关系
社会学
政治学
计算机科学
古生物学
社会科学
机器学习
进化生物学
法学
生物
作者
Jonathan R. Flinchum,Liana Kreamer,Steven G. Rogelberg,Janaki Gooty
标识
DOI:10.1177/20413866221097570
摘要
Meeting science has advanced significantly in its short history. However, one-on-one (1:1) meetings have not been studied empirically as a focal topic despite making up nearly half of all workplace meetings. While some meeting science insights may apply to 1:1 meetings, others may not (or may function differently) due to conceptual, theoretical, and practical differences between meetings involving dyads and groups. Although 1:1 meetings come in various forms (e.g., peer-to-peer, employee-to-customer), we chose to use manager-direct report 1:1 meetings as an exemplar given their prevalence, theoretical relevance, and practical implications. In this paper, we first review some conceptual differences between dyads and groups. We then discuss how these differences likely manifest in the meeting context (before, during, and after meetings), and outline related propositions. Last, we leverage this conceptual framework and subsequent propositions to provide guidance for future research and theory on 1:1 meetings. In doing so, we hope this paper will act as the impetus for research and theory development on 1:1 meetings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI