肠内给药
医学
胃肠病学
耐受性
内科学
呕吐
肠外营养
重症监护室
不利影响
作者
I. De Brito-Ashurst,M. Klebach,Elena Tsompanaki,Sundeep Kaul,Peter van Horssen,Zandrie Hofman
出处
期刊:Nutrients
[Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
日期:2021-07-10
卷期号:13 (7): 2362-2362
被引量:5
摘要
The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate gastrointestinal tolerance and protein absorption markers with a new enteral peptide formula (PF) compared to an isocaloric enteral intact protein standard formula (SF) containing the same amount of protein in ICU patients. Patients admitted to a cardio-thoracic intensive care unit expected to receive tube feeding for ≥5 days were randomized to receive either PF (1.5 kcal/mL) or SF in a double-blind manner for ≤14 days. Twenty-six patients were randomized (13 SF and 13 PF) and 23 (12 SF and 11 PF) completed at least 5 days of product administration. There were no statistically significant differences between the feeds during the first 5 days of intervention for diarrhea (SF:3 (23%); PF:5 (39%), p = 0.388), vomiting (SF:1 (8%); PF:2 (15%), p = 0.549), constipation (SF:7 (54%), PF:3 (23%), p = 0.115), and high gastric residual volume (>500 mL: SF:1 (8%); PF: 2 (15%), p = 0.535). There were no differences in plasma amino acids or urinary markers of protein absorption and metabolism. In conclusion, no major differences were found in tolerability and protein absorption markers between the standard intact protein formula and the peptide formula.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI