替莫唑胺
无容量
医学
胶质母细胞瘤
内科学
肿瘤科
放射治疗
随机对照试验
癌症研究
癌症
免疫疗法
作者
Antonio Omuro,Alba A. Brandes,Alain Carpentier,Ahmed Idbaïh,David A. Reardon,Timothy F. Cloughesy,Ashley Sumrall,Joachim M. Baehring,Martin J. van den Bent,Oliver Bähr,Giuseppe Lombardi,Paul Mulholland,Ghazaleh Tabatabai,Ulrik Lassen,Juan Manuel Sepúlveda-Sánchez,Mustafa Khasraw,Élodie Vauléon,Yoshihiro Muragaki,Anna Maria Di Giacomo,Nicholas Butowski
出处
期刊:Neuro-oncology
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2022-04-14
卷期号:25 (1): 123-134
被引量:433
标识
DOI:10.1093/neuonc/noac099
摘要
Abstract Background Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit. The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared with TMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT + TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily during RT and 150–200 mg/m2/day 5/28 days during maintenance). The primary endpoint was OS. Results A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) with TMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) with TMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) with TMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade serious TRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively. Conclusions The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use of TMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02617589
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI