Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References

计算机科学 自然语言处理 人工智能 聊天机器人 数据科学
作者
Sai Anirudh Athaluri,Sandeep Varma Manthena,V S R Krishna Manoj Kesapragada,Vineel Yarlagadda,Tirth Dave,Rama Tulasi Siri Duddumpudi
出处
期刊:Cureus [Cureus, Inc.]
卷期号:15 (4): e37432-e37432 被引量:320
标识
DOI:10.7759/cureus.37432
摘要

Background Chatbots are computer programs that use artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) to simulate conversations with humans. One such chatbot is ChatGPT, which uses the third-generation generative pre-trained transformer (GPT-3) developed by OpenAI. ChatGPT has been praised for its ability to generate text, but concerns have been raised about its accuracy and precision in generating data, as well as legal issues related to references. This study aims to investigate the frequency of AI hallucination in research proposals entirely drafted by ChatGPT. Methodology An analytical design was employed to investigate AI hallucination by ChatGPT. A total of 178 references listed by ChatGPT were verified for inclusion in the study. Statistical analysis was performed by five researchers who entered their data into a Google Form, and the final results were represented using pie charts and tables. Results Out of the 178 references analyzed, 69 references did not have a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), and 28 references neither turned up on Google search nor had an existing DOI. Three references were listed from books and not research articles. These observations suggest that ChatGPT's ability to generate reliable references for research topics may be limited by the availability of DOI and the accessibility of online articles. Conclusions The study highlights the potential limitations of ChatGPT's ability to generate reliable references for research proposals. AI hallucination is a problem that may negatively impact decision-making and may give rise to ethical and legal problems. Improving the training inputs by including diverse, accurate, and contextually relevant data sets along with frequent updates to the training models could potentially help address these issues. However, until these issues are addressed, researchers using ChatGPT should exercise caution in relying solely on the references generated by the AI chatbot.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
5秒前
Renee发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
NAN完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
fatcat完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
22秒前
香菜冲冲冲完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
28秒前
科研人完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
Renee发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
mito完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
afterglow完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
40秒前
千帆破浪完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
48秒前
babylow完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
Renee发布了新的文献求助10
54秒前
57秒前
小胖完成签到 ,获得积分10
57秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
无极微光应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
班尼肥鸭完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
小白完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
董是鑫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
科研肥料发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Vicou2025完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Renee发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
yangy801017完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
cdm700完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
芙瑞完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
laber完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
1分钟前
wanghao完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6444807
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8258579
关于积分的说明 17591494
捐赠科研通 5504451
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2901543
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1878538
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1718106