急性呼吸窘迫综合征
医学
损伤严重程度评分
格拉斯哥昏迷指数
急诊医学
急性呼吸窘迫
急诊科
生命体征
严重创伤
回顾性队列研究
伤害预防
医疗急救
重症监护医学
毒物控制
外科
内科学
肺
精神科
作者
Jason Nam,Matthew S. McCravy,Krista Haines,Sarah B. Thomas,James K. Aden,Luke R. Johnston,Phillip E. Mason,Jennifer M. Gurney,Valerie G. Sams
摘要
The purpose of our study was to assess risks/ outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in US combat casualties. We hypothesized that combat trauma patients with ARDS would have worse outcomes based on mechanism of injury (MOI) and labs/vital signs aberrancies.We reviewed data on military Servicemembers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2015 diagnosed with ARDS by ICD-9 code. We extracted patient demographics, injury specifics, and mortality from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR).The most common MOI was an explosion, accounting for 67.6% of all injuries. Nonsurvivors were more likely to have explosion-related injuries, have higher injury severity score (ISS), higher international normalized ratio (INR), lower platelet count, greater base deficit, lower temperature, lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and lower pH. There was no significant difference in deaths across time.By identifying characteristics of patients with higher mortality in trauma ARDS, we can develop treatment guidelines to improve outcomes. Given the high mortality associated with trauma ARDS and relative paucity of clinical data available, we need to improve battlefield data capture to better guide practice and ultimately improve care. The management of ARDS will be increasingly relevant in prolonged casualty care (PCC; formerly prolonged field care) on the modern battlefield.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI