验证性因素分析
探索性因素分析
结构效度
比例(比率)
心理学
构造(python库)
项目分析
差异(会计)
可靠性(半导体)
维数(图论)
样品(材料)
应用心理学
心理测量学
计算机科学
结构方程建模
统计
发展心理学
数学
会计
色谱法
纯数学
化学
程序设计语言
业务
量子力学
功率(物理)
物理
作者
Seval Fer,Levent Ertuna,İbrahim UYSAL,Meli̇h Derya Gürer,Murat Debbağ,Fatih Karataş,Derya Karadeniz,Yasemin Kuzgun,Esma Genç,İlker Cırık,Sevilay Yıldız,Hülya Pehlivan
出处
期刊:Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
日期:2024-07-28
卷期号:12 (2): 888-924
标识
DOI:10.46778/goputeb.1460366
摘要
Learners can demonstrate the performance expected of them in study skills individually or with peers. The literature shows that there is no customization of study skills, such as working individually or with peers. Therefore, there is a need for measurement tools that can identify the needs of learners while determining their study skills for both individual and peer activities. This study aims to develop a scale to measure university students' individual and peer study skills. The research was conducted using an exploratory correlational design, and data was collected from two different samples for pilot and validation applications. The pilot and validation application sample comprised 470 and 323 teacher candidates. Item analysis for item validity and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) for construct validity were conducted on the pilot study data. Before the EFA, optimal parallel analysis was used to examine the scale's dimensionality. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on the validation data to gather evidence for construct validity. The optimal parallel analysis suggested a two-dimensional structure for the scale. As a result of the EFA, a two-dimensional construct with 28 items, consisting of 16 and 12 items in each dimension, explained 58.8% of the variance. The first dimension of the scale was named peer study skills, and the second was named individual study skills. Item analysis revealed that the discrimination of the items in both dimensions was sufficient. The CFA results confirmed the two-factor construct of the scale. The trial and validation studies data showed that the reliability coefficients, considering both dimensions individually and the overall scale, indicated that the scores are reliable.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI