Imaging software accuracy for 3-dimensional analysis of the upper airway

成像体模 锥束ct 组内相关 核医学 协议(科学) 重复措施设计 邦费罗尼校正 医学 医学物理学 图基射程试验 计算机科学 金标准(测试) 生物医学工程 再现性 放射科 计算机断层摄影术 数学 统计 病理 替代医学
作者
André Weissheimer,Luciane Macedo de Menezes,Glenn T. Sameshima,Reyes Enciso,John Pham,Dan Grauer
出处
期刊:American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:142 (6): 801-813 被引量:196
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.07.015
摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the precision and accuracy of 6 imaging software programs for measuring upper airway volumes in cone-beam computed tomography data.The sample consisted of 33 growing patients and an oropharynx acrylic phantom, scanned with an i-CAT scanner (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, Pa). The known oropharynx acrylic phantom volume was used as the gold standard. Semi-automatic segmentations with interactive and fixed threshold protocols of the patients' oropharynx and oropharynx acrylic phantom were performed by using Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium), ITK-Snap (www.itksnap.org), OsiriX (Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland), Dolphin3D (Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif), InVivo Dental (Anatomage, San Jose, Calif), and Ondemand3D (CyberMed, Seoul, Korea) software programs. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used for the reliability tests. A repeated measurements analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and post-hoc tests (Bonferroni) were used to compare the software programs.The reliability was high for all programs. With the interactive threshold protocol, the oropharynx acrylic phantom segmentations with Mimics, Dolphin3D, OsiriX, and ITK-Snap showed less than 2% errors in volumes compared with the gold standard. Ondemand3D and InVivo Dental had more than 5% errors compared with the gold standard. With the fixed threshold protocol, the volume errors were similar (-11.1% to -11.7%) among the programs. In the oropharynx segmentation with the interactive protocol, ITK-Snap, Mimics, OsiriX, and Dolphin3D were statistically significantly different (P <0.05) from InVivo Dental. No statistical difference (P >0.05) was found between InVivo Dental and OnDemand3D.All 6 imaging software programs were reliable but had errors in the volume segmentations of the oropharynx. Mimics, Dolphin3D, ITK-Snap, and OsiriX were similar and more accurate than InVivo Dental and Ondemand3D for upper airway assessment.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
自信向梦完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
重要以山完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
mawanyu完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
852应助崔同学采纳,获得10
12秒前
bing完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
gxmu6322完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
77最可爱完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
雪白的冥幽完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
27秒前
解觅荷发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
深情夏彤完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
77完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
fangzhang发布了新的文献求助30
32秒前
zakai完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
失眠的血茗完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
呜啦啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
杨春末完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
长风完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
47秒前
沐颜发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
pzh完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
Hello应助杨春末采纳,获得10
51秒前
李卿卫发布了新的文献求助10
54秒前
55秒前
胡图图完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
崔同学发布了新的文献求助10
59秒前
雪狐417完成签到 ,获得积分10
59秒前
bill完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
胡图图发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
1分钟前
过时的电灯胆完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
笨笨芯发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
坚果完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
糖糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
李爱国应助小江采纳,获得10
1分钟前
虾米吃螃蟹完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
suix237完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
早早完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
ISCN 2024 – An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 3000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Mindfulness and Character Strengths: A Practitioner's Guide to MBSP 380
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3776410
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3321842
关于积分的说明 10208028
捐赠科研通 3037175
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1666562
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 797579
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 757872