医学
神经重症监护
动员
随机对照试验
临床试验
重症监护医学
冲程(发动机)
物理疗法
外科
内科学
历史
考古
机械工程
工程类
作者
Monisha A. Kumar,Francisco G. Romero,Kiruba Dharaneeswaran
标识
DOI:10.1097/mcc.0000000000000709
摘要
Purpose of review To examine the potential benefits of early mobilization in neurocritically ill patients and to summarize the recent evidence for and against early mobilization. Recent findings Early ICU mobilization in medically critically ill patients may decrease ICU and hospital length of stay, increase discharge-to-home, and reduce medical costs. Whether these benefits apply to neurologically critically ill patients remains unclear, as neuro ICU patients are often excluded from trials of early mobility. Neurocritically ill patients may present with hemodynamic instability, acute hemiplegia, altered consciousness and visual field deficits which complicate mobilization, or have cerebral ischemia, which may be exacerbated when upright or active. Results of early mobilization in neurocritical care are mixed. For example, a randomized trial in acute ischemic stroke demonstrated that very early mobilization was associated with worse outcomes. However, many smaller intervention trials in neurocritical care demonstrate safety and feasibility with early mobilization, including those in patients with invasive devices, for example, external ventricular drains. Summary Given successes in other critically ill populations, early mobility of neurocritically ill patients may be warranted. However, caution should be exercised given the results in acute stroke trials. In addition, before routine use, the character, quality, dose, duration, and timing of early mobilization therapies requires further definition.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI