医学
德尔菲法
临床试验
临床研究
医学物理学
协调
标准化
立场声明
德尔菲
术语
梅德林
微小残留病
赫尔辛基宣言
重症监护医学
家庭医学
疾病
立场文件
危险分层
肿瘤科
成果研究
报销
一致性
内科学
循环肿瘤DNA
范围(计算机科学)
考试(生物学)
协商一致会议
辅助治疗
临床肿瘤学
研究设计
靶向治疗
语句(逻辑)
周转时间
作者
Aaron C. Tan,Bin-Chi Liao,Molly SC Li,David Dai-Wee Lee,Yuji Uehara,Lucksamon Thamlikitkul,Jia‐Tao Zhang,D G Kim,Tony S.K. Mok,Daniel Shao-Weng Tan,Yan Wu,Myung‐Ju Ahn,ATORG MRD Consensus Group Members
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.2026.44.19_suppl.289
摘要
289 Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection using liquid biopsy is an emerging tool for risk stratification and monitoring for recurrence in resected early-stage NSCLC. There is increasing need for clear guidance on its optimal clinical implementation. Methods: The Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group (ATORG) convened a multi-disciplinary panel of 27 experts to develop a consensus statement on the clinical application of ctDNA-based MRD testing in early-stage resected NSCLC, using a structured Delphi methodology. Statements were organized into broad thematic domains: assay validity and standardization; harmonization in research and trials; clinical application; challenges in implementation; consensus recommendations; infrastructure for regional MRD adoption; and roadmap for pragmatic trials. Results: A total of 23 position statements were developed, of which all except one achieved strong consensus. The consensus highlighted the need to define minimum analytical performance thresholds for MRD assays, improve standardization of reporting metrics, and clear guidelines for pre-analytical handling. Harmonization of blood sampling timepoints and terminology across clinical trials is also essential to confirm the prognostic value of MRD assays. While current MRD assays demonstrate high specificity and positive predictive value, variable sensitivity precludes routine use for adjuvant therapy de-escalation outside clinical trials. Broader access, sustainable funding, ongoing consensus building and collaborative real-world data generation are also critical to support clinical implementation and adoption. Future clinical trials must account for the distinct biology and changing standards of care associated with different driver genes. Conclusions: These consensus recommendations provide a pragmatic framework to guide the responsible integration of MRD testing into clinical research and practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI