Evaluation of rat and rabbit embryofetal development studies with pharmaceuticals: the added value of a second species

兔子(密码) 化学 价值(数学) 毒理 药理学 生物 数学 统计
作者
Puck Roos,Caroline Anggasta,Aldert H. Piersma,Peter J.K. van Meer,Peter T. Theunissen
出处
期刊:Critical Reviews in Toxicology [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:54 (9): 619-633 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1080/10408444.2024.2374281
摘要

Embryofetal development (EFD) studies are performed to characterize risk of drugs in pregnant women and on embryofetal development. In line with the ICH S5(R3) guideline, these studies are generally conducted in one rodent and one non-rodent species, commonly rats and rabbits. However, the added value of conducting EFD studies in two species to risk assessment is debatable. In this study, rat and rabbit EFD studies were evaluated to analyze the added value of a second species. Information on rat and rabbit EFD studies conducted for human pharmaceuticals submitted for marketing authorization to the European Medicines Agency between 2004 and 2022 was collected from the database of the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, along with EFD studies conducted for known human teratogens. In total, 369 compounds were included in the database. For 55.6% of the compounds similar effects were observed in rat and rabbit EFD studies. Discordance was observed for 44.6% of compounds. Discordance could often be explained based on occurrence of maternal toxicity or the compound's mechanism of action. For other compounds, discordance was considered of limited clinical relevance due to high exposure margins or less concerning EFD toxicity. For 6.2%, discordance could not be explained and was considered clinically relevant. Furthermore, for specific therapeutic classes, concordance between rat and rabbit could vary. In conclusion, in many cases the added value of conducting EFD studies in two species is limited. These data could help identify scenarios in which (additional) EFD studies could be waived or create a weight-of-evidence model to determine the need for (additional) EFD studies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
CT发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
Frank完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
6秒前
无悔完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
molihuakai的应助被小马采纳,获得10
7秒前
ZhaiSherry完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
馒头完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
9秒前
Ed23发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
Aan发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
吃饭饭发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
嘿哈完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Aaaa完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
FashionBoy的应助被小羊打嗝采纳,获得10
17秒前
19秒前
19秒前
dearjener137369完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
NexusExplorer的应助被羞涩的烨华采纳,获得10
20秒前
21秒前
你好你好的应助被yqt采纳,获得10
21秒前
24秒前
wellscurry完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
彩色白秋完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
tang发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
打打的应助被hjygzv采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
25秒前
Shane完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
wellscurry发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
小郭完成签到,获得积分20
28秒前
Zel博博发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
大模型的应助被Xavier采纳,获得30
31秒前
小郭发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
33秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
A Will for the Machine: Computerization, Automation, and the Arts in South Africa 400
Decentring Leadership 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7808482
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9340932
关于积分的说明 20504440
捐赠科研通 7400789
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3328838
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2475566
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2347226