医学
审计
心理干预
经济评价
作业成本法
随机对照试验
医疗保健
急诊医学
干预(咨询)
成本效益
医疗急救
护理部
外科
营销
管理
经济
业务
病理
风险分析(工程)
经济增长
作者
David Brain,Nirmali Sivapragasam,Katrina Browne,Nicole White,Philip L. Russo,Allen C. Cheng,Andrew J. Stewardson,Georgia Matterson,Peta Ellen Tehan,Kirsty Graham,Maham Amin,Martin Kiernan,Jennie King,Brett G Mitchell
出处
期刊:JAMA network open
[American Medical Association]
日期:2025-04-10
卷期号:8 (4): e258565-e258565
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8565
摘要
Importance The economic value of cleaning and disinfection of shared medical equipment is currently unknown. Objective To evaluate whether or not better environmental cleaning and disinfection of shared medical equipment would be cost-effective compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants This economic evaluation study was a within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial: the Cleaning and Enhanced Disinfection (CLEEN) study. The trial included 5002 inpatients and was conducted in 10 adult acute-care wards at a tertiary hospital in Australia between March 20, 2023, and November 24, 2023. The evaluation takes a hospital costing perspective. A decision-tree model was developed to evaluate the intervention; costs are presented in Australian dollars. Statistical analysis was performed from May to October 2024. Interventions A multimodal cleaning intervention was introduced during the intervention, focusing on additional cleaning hours, education, audit, and feedback. The control group received usual care, including routine cleaning by clinical staff. Main Outcomes and Measures Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, where the mean change to costs associated with the intervention is divided by the mean change in outcomes. Results This study assessed 5002 patients (2478 [49.5%] male, 2524 [50.5%] female [50.5%]; mean [SD] age, 71.6 [16.1] years). For a cohort of 1000 patients at risk of health care–associated infection (HAI), the estimated total costs associated with the intervention were $1 513 300, compared with $2 155 310 for usual care. The estimated number of HAIs was 100 in the intervention group, compared with 130 for the usual care group. Compared with usual care, the intervention was associated with reduced HAIs and costs, with a 90.5% chance that intervention adoption was cost-saving. This probability increased to 99.9% if a decision-maker was willing to pay $20 000 to avoid an infection. Conclusions and Relevance In this economic evaluation study of enhanced cleaning and disinfection of shared medical equipment, the intervention resulted in reduced HAIs and a $642 010 reduction in costs per 1000 patients, compared with the control group. These results suggest that the CLEEN intervention is a cost-saving initiative.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI