摘要
No AccessJournal of UrologyPediatric Urology1 Jun 2012Pediatric Urinary Stone Composition in the United States J. Scott Gabrielsen, Robert J. Laciak, Elizabeth L. Frank, Molly McFadden, Cory S. Bates, Siam Oottamasathien, Blake D. Hamilton, and M. Chad Wallis J. Scott GabrielsenJ. Scott Gabrielsen Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah , Robert J. LaciakRobert J. Laciak Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah , Elizabeth L. FrankElizabeth L. Frank Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah , Molly McFaddenMolly McFadden Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah , Cory S. BatesCory S. Bates Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah , Siam OottamasathienSiam Oottamasathien Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah , Blake D. HamiltonBlake D. Hamilton Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah , and M. Chad WallisM. Chad Wallis Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.124AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: The incidence of urolithiasis in children is increasing. However, stone composition studies in this population are limited. We sought to determine the effects of age, gender and geographical location on urinary stone composition in the United States pediatric population. Materials and Methods: We obtained composition analyses for all urinary stones submitted to a reference laboratory between 2000 and 2009. Stones were excluded if the patient was younger than 1 year or older than 18 years. Stone composition was determined by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine associations between stone composition frequency and age, gender and geographical region. Results: A total of 5,245 stones were included in our analysis. Calcium was found in 89.2% of stones. The percentage of stones containing calcium oxalate increased, while magnesium ammonium phosphate and ammonium acid urate containing stones decreased with age. Calcium oxalate and magnesium ammonium phosphate containing stones were more common in females, while uric acid stones were more common in males. Additionally, significant differences in stone composition frequency were noted between males and females in specific age groups and between age groups within the same gender. Geographical distribution was not significantly associated with stone composition. Conclusions: This series is the largest analysis to date of urinary stone composition in the pediatric population in the United States. Age and gender were significantly associated with stone composition, while geographical region was not significantly associated with stone composition. References 1 : Nephrolithiasis in children. Pediatr Rev2004; 25: 131. Google Scholar 2 : Sex prevalence of pediatric kidney stone disease in the United States: an epidemiologic investigation. Urology2009; 74: 104. Google Scholar 3 : Urolithiasis in childhood. Pediatr Clin North Am1987; 34: 683. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 4 : Increasing incidence of kidney stones in children evaluated in the emergency department. J Pediatr2010; 157: 132. Google Scholar 5 : Urolithiasis in pediatric patients: a single center study of incidence, clinical presentation and outcome. J Urol2007; 177: 2300. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Childhood urolithiasis. J Urol1979; 121: 662. Link, Google Scholar 7 : Epidemiology of paediatric renal stone disease in the UK. Arch Dis Child2003; 88: 962. Google Scholar 8 : Urolithiasis in Tunisian children: a study of 120 cases based on stone composition. Pediatr Nephrol1999; 13: 920. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 9 : Metabolic stone composition in Egyptian children. J Pediatr Urol2009; 5: 132. Google Scholar 10 : Pediatric urinary stone disease—does age matter?. J Urol2009; 181: 2267. Link, Google Scholar 11 : Evaluation and treatment of pediatric idiopathic urolithiasis—revisited. Pediatr Nephrol2004; 19: 516. Google Scholar 12 : Pediatric urolithiasis: experience at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Can Urol Assoc J2008; 2: 381. Google Scholar 13 : Updates in Pediatric Urology: Highlights of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Urology Annual Meeting, October 8–10, 2005, Washington, DC. Rev Urol2006; 8: 23. Google Scholar 14 : Pediatric urolithiasis: developing nation perspectives. J Urol2002; 168: 1522. Link, Google Scholar 15 : Pediatric kidney stones: long-term outcomes. Urology2006; 67: 812. Google Scholar 16 : Infection stones in children: a twenty-seven-year review. Urology1994; 43: 525. Google Scholar 17 : Decreased incidence of urinary tract infections in circumcised male infants. Pediatrics1985; 75: 901. Google Scholar 18 : Pediatric urinary tract infections. Pediatr Clin North Am2006; 53: 379. Google Scholar 19 : Ammonium acid urate calculi: a reevaluation of risk factors. J Urol1999; 161: 869. Link, Google Scholar 20 : Uric acid excretion in normal children. J Pediatr1978; 92: 911. Google Scholar 21 : Clinical outcome of pediatric stone disease. J Urol2002; 167: 670. Link, Google Scholar © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byRoss S, Masko E, Abern M, Allott E, Routh J, Wiener J, Preminger G, Freedland S and Lipkin M (2013) The Effect of Dietary Sodium and Fructose Intake on Urine and Serum Parameters of Stone Formation in a Pediatric Mouse Model: A Pilot StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 190, NO. 4S, (1484-1489), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013. Volume 187Issue 6June 2012Page: 2182-2187 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsnephrolithiasispediatricsurinary calculiMetrics Author Information J. Scott Gabrielsen Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah More articles by this author Robert J. Laciak Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah More articles by this author Elizabeth L. Frank Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah More articles by this author Molly McFadden Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah More articles by this author Cory S. Bates Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah More articles by this author Siam Oottamasathien Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah More articles by this author Blake D. Hamilton Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah More articles by this author M. Chad Wallis Division of Urology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...