医学教育
同行反馈
建设性的
内容分析
阿迪模型
心理学
过程(计算)
同行评审
定性研究
数学教育
计算机科学
教育学
医学
课程
社会学
操作系统
法学
社会科学
政治学
作者
Kristen A. Sethares,Nancy S. Morris
标识
DOI:10.3928/01484834-20160516-07
摘要
Peer review is an expectation of PhD-prepared nurses but a lack of evidence in the best methods to train students is of concern.Guided by the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) model, faculty at two universities developed, implemented, and evaluated a peer review assignment for 22 second-year PhD nursing students. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis.Students reported the process of peer review was beneficial (82%) because it informed their own writing (59%), assisted them to read more critically (73%), and increased their appreciation of the role of peer review in the revision process (77%). Giving constructive feedback was difficult for students, but the feedback they received was helpful.Peer review is important to the development of science and an expectation of PhD-prepared nurses. Methods to include peer review in education are needed. [J Nurs Educ. 2016;55(6):342-344.].
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI