心理学
构造(python库)
比例(比率)
投资(军事)
可靠性(半导体)
结构效度
社会心理学
质量(理念)
一致性(知识库)
内部一致性
度量(数据仓库)
计量经济学
心理测量学
发展心理学
经济
数学
计算机科学
数据挖掘
几何学
政治
政治学
量子力学
法学
程序设计语言
功率(物理)
哲学
物理
认识论
作者
Caryl E. Rusbult,John M. Martz,Christopher R. Agnew
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
摘要
Abstract Three studies evaluated the reliability and validity of the Investment Model Scale, an instrument designed to measure four constructs, including commitment level and three bases of dependence–satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. In all three studies, reliability analyses revealed good internal consistency among items designed to measure each construct. Also, principal components analyses performed on scale items revealed evidence of four factors, with items designed to measure each construct loading on independent factors. Studies 2 and 3 examined associations of model variables with instruments measuring diverse qualities of relationships and assorted personal dispositions. As anticipated, Investment Model variables were moderately associated with other measures reflecting superior couple functioning (e.g., dyadic adjustment, trust level, inclusion of other in the self), and were essentially unrelated to measures assessing personal dispositions (e.g., need for cognition, self‐esteem). In addition, Study 3 demonstrated that earlier measures of Investment Model variables predicted later levels of dyadic adjustment and later relationship status (persisted vs. ended). It is hoped that the existence of a reliable and valid Investment Model Scale will promote further research regarding commitment and interdependence in ongoing close relationships.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI