Lurkers versus posters: Perceptions of learning in informal social media‐based communities

非正式学习 社会化媒体 感知 社会学习 心理学 学习型社区 协作学习 探索性研究 社会学 数学教育 教育学 计算机科学 万维网 社会科学 神经科学
作者
Jiawen Zhu,Kara Dawson
出处
期刊:British Journal of Educational Technology [Wiley]
卷期号:54 (4): 924-942 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1111/bjet.13303
摘要

Abstract The growth of social media has given rise to many informal online communities. In these communities, people communicate, make connections, exchange information and transfer knowledge without time or location restrictions. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate both lurkers' and posters' perceptions of learning in Reddit‐based education‐related communities. A mixed‐method approach was used to obtain an overall understanding of how members perceived learning and the differences between posters and lurkers. Eighty‐two participants (43 posters and 39 lurkers) were recruited from education‐related subreddits and nine of them (5 posters and 4 lurkers) were interviewed. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the perceptions of learning between posters and lurkers. Both lurkers and posters believed that they have learned in these communities, and both defined learning in these communities as changing behaviours or thinking or applying what they have learned to real‐life situations. Although both lurkers and posters reported having learned in the communities, qualitative analysis of the interview data indicated that posters demonstrated higher learning levels than lurkers. The findings of this study offer implications for further research into how members perceive learning in informal social media‐based communities. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Although informal social media‐based communities are not designed for learning, given the large user base and wide accessibility, these communities do provide social spaces for users and promote informal online learning. Research regarding perceptions of learning has thus far been mostly focused on formal learning settings and less on informal online environments. It is difficult to investigate how members, especially lurkers who rarely post, perceive learning in informal online environments. What this paper adds Both lurkers and posters report that they learn in education‐related subreddits, and there is no significant difference between how lurkers and posters perceive learning based on the quantitative data. Both lurkers and posters believe that if they change their behaviours or thoughts, or apply the information they receive in real life, then they have learned. Both lurkers and posters tend to pay more attention to the information itself than to who the information came from. Posters communicate more with other members of the communities and tend to apply, analyse and evaluate information from the community to a greater degree than lurkers. Implications for practice and policy It may be unrealistic for educators and community managers to encourage every member of the community to be an active poster, but encouraging members to share and interact can increase the likelihood that they will more carefully apply and analyse what they have learned. Instruction from the community managers or moderators could be necessary to provide guidance for members to offer contexts or backgrounds before making a post. This effort does not require members to write down their real names or provide their personal information in the posts but may ask them to provide some background information. The background information is also important to community members in deciding whether to adopt the opinions based on the context information or determine how to adjust and apply the content to their own teaching scenarios. Community managers or moderators may need to provide guidance to members so that members can provide appropriate contexts or background information before making a post. Other community members can use the information to decide whether to adopt the opinions or to determine how to adjust and apply the content.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
羊东蒽发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
小菜在努力了完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
激动的萧发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
学医的杨同学完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
研友_RLNzvL发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
chizuru发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
李健应助皮卡丘采纳,获得10
9秒前
小江不饿完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
hanchangcun发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
激动的萧完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
14秒前
19秒前
20秒前
归尘发布了新的文献求助30
21秒前
23秒前
24秒前
爆米花应助纯情的心情采纳,获得10
27秒前
28秒前
34秒前
zbzfp完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
羊东蒽完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
无奈芸完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
焰火青年给焰火青年的求助进行了留言
42秒前
kkkkkoi完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
44秒前
无聊的老姆完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
annafan完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
haofan17完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
激动的访文完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
无奈芸发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
50秒前
pluto应助安白采纳,获得10
55秒前
枫之林发布了新的文献求助10
55秒前
是谁还没睡完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
吴云鹏发布了新的文献求助10
57秒前
体贴皮带完成签到 ,获得积分10
59秒前
华仔应助Lm采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Ava应助萤火虫采纳,获得10
1分钟前
完美世界应助吴云鹏采纳,获得20
1分钟前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3777983
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3323609
关于积分的说明 10215097
捐赠科研通 3038781
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1667645
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798329
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758315