清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Lurkers versus posters: Perceptions of learning in informal social media‐based communities

非正式学习 社会化媒体 感知 社会学习 心理学 学习型社区 协作学习 探索性研究 社会学 数学教育 教育学 计算机科学 万维网 社会科学 神经科学
作者
Jiawen Zhu,Kara Dawson
出处
期刊:British Journal of Educational Technology [Wiley]
卷期号:54 (4): 924-942 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1111/bjet.13303
摘要

Abstract The growth of social media has given rise to many informal online communities. In these communities, people communicate, make connections, exchange information and transfer knowledge without time or location restrictions. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate both lurkers' and posters' perceptions of learning in Reddit‐based education‐related communities. A mixed‐method approach was used to obtain an overall understanding of how members perceived learning and the differences between posters and lurkers. Eighty‐two participants (43 posters and 39 lurkers) were recruited from education‐related subreddits and nine of them (5 posters and 4 lurkers) were interviewed. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the perceptions of learning between posters and lurkers. Both lurkers and posters believed that they have learned in these communities, and both defined learning in these communities as changing behaviours or thinking or applying what they have learned to real‐life situations. Although both lurkers and posters reported having learned in the communities, qualitative analysis of the interview data indicated that posters demonstrated higher learning levels than lurkers. The findings of this study offer implications for further research into how members perceive learning in informal social media‐based communities. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Although informal social media‐based communities are not designed for learning, given the large user base and wide accessibility, these communities do provide social spaces for users and promote informal online learning. Research regarding perceptions of learning has thus far been mostly focused on formal learning settings and less on informal online environments. It is difficult to investigate how members, especially lurkers who rarely post, perceive learning in informal online environments. What this paper adds Both lurkers and posters report that they learn in education‐related subreddits, and there is no significant difference between how lurkers and posters perceive learning based on the quantitative data. Both lurkers and posters believe that if they change their behaviours or thoughts, or apply the information they receive in real life, then they have learned. Both lurkers and posters tend to pay more attention to the information itself than to who the information came from. Posters communicate more with other members of the communities and tend to apply, analyse and evaluate information from the community to a greater degree than lurkers. Implications for practice and policy It may be unrealistic for educators and community managers to encourage every member of the community to be an active poster, but encouraging members to share and interact can increase the likelihood that they will more carefully apply and analyse what they have learned. Instruction from the community managers or moderators could be necessary to provide guidance for members to offer contexts or backgrounds before making a post. This effort does not require members to write down their real names or provide their personal information in the posts but may ask them to provide some background information. The background information is also important to community members in deciding whether to adopt the opinions based on the context information or determine how to adjust and apply the content to their own teaching scenarios. Community managers or moderators may need to provide guidance to members so that members can provide appropriate contexts or background information before making a post. Other community members can use the information to decide whether to adopt the opinions or to determine how to adjust and apply the content.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
车访枫完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
修辛完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
玛卡巴卡爱吃饭完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
心随以动完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
香蕉觅云应助受伤雨南采纳,获得10
44秒前
Arctic完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
吴静完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
受伤雨南发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
受伤雨南完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
情怀应助威威采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
momo发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
威威发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
优秀怜晴发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
汉堡包应助优秀怜晴采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
momo完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
风中星月完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
Droplet完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
一人独钓一江秋完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
马仔猴完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
欣欣发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
姚老表完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
SciGPT应助欣欣采纳,获得10
4分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
9527完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
555完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
大气思柔完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
卜哥完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
紫熊完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
蛋卷完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
可靠花生完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
慎二完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
糟糕的翅膀完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
Hiram完成签到,获得积分0
7分钟前
机智的苗条完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Cambridge History of China: Volume 4, Sui and T'ang China, 589–906 AD, Part Two 1500
Cowries - A Guide to the Gastropod Family Cypraeidae 1200
Quality by Design - An Indispensable Approach to Accelerate Biopharmaceutical Product Development 800
Pulse width control of a 3-phase inverter with non sinusoidal phase voltages 777
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Research Methods for Applied Linguistics: A Practical Guide 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6399350
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8215393
关于积分的说明 17407717
捐赠科研通 5452686
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2881881
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1858293
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1700326