心理学
操作化
人口
应用心理学
探索性研究
定性研究
包裹体(矿物)
检查表
实证研究
美国手语
临床心理学
医学教育
社会心理学
手语
认知心理学
医学
语言学
社会学
哲学
社会科学
人类学
环境卫生
认识论
作者
Melissa L. Anderson,Kelly S. Wolf Craig,Douglas Ziedonis
标识
DOI:10.1093/deafed/enw066
摘要
Deaf individuals experience significant obstacles to participating in behavioral health research when careful consideration is not given to accessibility during the design of study methodology. To inform such considerations, we conducted an exploratory secondary analysis of a mixed-methods study that originally explored 16 Deaf trauma survivors' help-seeking experiences. Our objective was to identify key findings and qualitative themes from consumers' own words that could be applied to the design of behavioral clinical trials methodology. In many ways, the themes that emerged were not wholly dissimilar from the general preferences of members of other sociolinguistic minority groups-a need for communication access, empathy, respect, strict confidentiality procedures, trust, and transparency of the research process. Yet, how these themes are applied to the inclusion of Deaf research participants is distinct from any other sociolinguistic minority population, given Deaf people's unique sensory and linguistic characteristics. We summarize our findings in a preliminary "Checklist for Designing Deaf Behavioral Clinical Trials" to operationalize the steps researchers can take to apply Deaf-friendly approaches in their empirical work.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI