听力学家
医学
心理干预
人工耳蜗植入
介绍
家庭医学
听力学
听力损失
护理部
作者
M.H. Freeman,Ankita Patro,Nathan R. Lindquist,Katelyn A. Berg,Jourdan T. Holder,Matthew R. O’Malley,Kareem O. Tawfik,Taha A. Jan,Elizabeth L. Perkins,Aaron C. Moberly,David S. Haynes,Marc Bennett
标识
DOI:10.1097/mao.0000000000004375
摘要
Objective To assess the factors that drive a patient’s selection of cochlear implant (CI) manufacturer. Study Design Prospective survey study. Setting Tertiary referral center. Patients One hundred twenty-eight adult patients undergoing primary CI. Interventions Survey administered in the preoperative area. Main Outcome Measures Sources of information regarding CI manufacturer offerings, factors that were most important in deciding on a manufacturer, and manufacturer ultimately selected. Results One hundred twenty-eight patients were included (average age, 63.7 years; 97% White). The most cited source of information that patients used to choose a device was his/her audiologist (80.5% of patients). When asked his/her number 1 reason for choosing their CI manufacturer, the most commonly cited reason was technology (e.g., battery life, device pairing), regardless of manufacturer. When asked about specific technology offerings, hearing aid pairing was rated as the most important. The numbers 2 and 3 reasons for choosing a manufacturer were cosmetics/structure of the wearable portion of the device and audiologist recommendation of that manufacturer, respectively. The relative weight given to each of the top 3 reasons differed significantly across the three manufacturers ( p = 0.017). Conclusions Audiologists are by far the leading source of information used by patients choosing a CI manufacturer. Patients prioritize technology most when choosing an implant manufacturer, but audiologist recommendation and the cosmetics and structure of the wearable device are also important. CI manufacturers should be mindful of patient priorities when designing and marketing their devices.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI