作者
Ignacio J. Ansotegui,Giovanni Melioli,Giorgio Walter Canonica,Luis Caraballo,Elisa Villa,Motohiro Ebisawa,Giovanni Passalacqua,Eleonora Savi,Didier G. Ebo,Sandra Nora González Díaz,Olga Luengo,Thomas B. Casale,Erika Jensen‐Jarolim,David Fischer,Tari Haahtela,Martti Antila,Jean Bousquet,Victòria Cardona,Wen Chin Chiang,Pascal Demoly,L.M. DuBuske,Marta Ferrer,Roy Gerth van Wijk,Sandra Nora González Díaz,Alexei Gonzalez‐Estrada,Edgardo Jares,Ayşe Füsun Kalpaklıoğlu,Luciana Kase Tanno,Marek L. Kowalski,Dennis K. Ledford,Olga Patricia Monge-Ortega,Mário Morais de Almeida,Oliver Pfaar,Lars K. Poulsen,Ruby Pawankar,Harald Renz,Antonino Romano,Nelson Rosário,Lanny Rosenwasser,Mario A. Sánchez Borges,Enrico Scala,Gianenrico Senna,Juan Carlos Ivancevich,Mimi L.K. Tang,Bernard Yu‐Hor Thong,Rudolf Valenta,Robert A. Wood,Torsten Zuberbier
摘要
Abstract
Currently, testing for immunoglobulin E (IgE) sensitization is the cornerstone of diagnostic evaluation in suspected allergic conditions. This review provides a thorough and updated critical appraisal of the most frequently used diagnostic tests, both in vivo and in vitro. It discusses skin tests, challenges, and serological and cellular in vitro tests, and provides an overview of indications, advantages and disadvantages of each in conditions such as respiratory, food, venom, drug, and occupational allergy. Skin prick testing remains the first line approach in most instances; the added value of serum specific IgE to whole allergen extracts or components, as well as the role of basophil activation tests, is evaluated. Unproven, non-validated, diagnostic tests are also discussed. Throughout the review, the reader must bear in mind the relevance of differentiating between sensitization and allergy; the latter entails not only allergic sensitization, but also clinically relevant symptoms triggered by the culprit allergen.