致盲
物理疗法
医学
置信区间
临床试验
质量得分
质量(理念)
随机对照试验
比例(比率)
医学物理学
物理医学与康复
内科学
公制(单位)
哲学
运营管理
物理
认识论
量子力学
经济
作者
Neil A. Smart,Mark Waldron,Hashbullah Ismail,Francesco Giallauria,Carlo Vigorito,Véronique Cornelissen,Gudrun Dieberg
出处
期刊:International Journal of Evidence-based Healthcare
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2015-03-01
卷期号:13 (1): 9-18
被引量:407
标识
DOI:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000020
摘要
Introduction: Several established tools are available to assess study quality and reporting of randomized controlled trials; however, these tools were designed with clinical intervention trials in mind. In exercise training intervention trials some of the traditional study quality criteria, such as participant or researcher blinding, are extremely difficult to implement. Methods: We developed the Tool for the assEssment of Study qualiTy and reporting in EXercise (TESTEX) – a study quality and reporting assessment tool, designed specifically for use in exercise training studies. Our tool is a 15-point scale (5 points for study quality and 10 points for reporting) and addresses previously unmentioned quality assessment criteria specific to exercise training studies. Results: There were no systematic differences between the summated TESTEX scores of each observer [H(2) = 0.392, P = 0.822]. There was a significant association between the summated TESTEX scores of the three observers, with almost perfect agreement between observers 1 and 2 [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–0.97, P < 0.001], observers 1 and 3 (ICC = 0.96, 95% CI 0.89–0.98, P < 0.001) and observers 2 and 3 (ICC = 0.91, 95% CI 0.75–0.96, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The TESTEX scale is a new, reliable tool, specific to exercise scientists, that facilitates a comprehensive review of exercise training trials.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI