医学
沙发评分
感染性休克
安慰剂
败血症
随机对照试验
中期分析
内科学
器官功能障碍
不利影响
外科
麻醉
病理
替代医学
作者
Thiago Miranda Lopes de Almeida,Flávio Geraldo Rezende Freitas,Rodrigo C. Figueiredo,Sandra Gomes de Barros Houly,Luciano César Pontes Azevedo,Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti,Lucas Petri Damiani,Bianca Silva Svicero,Maria Aparecida de Souza,Cíntia Loss Sartori Bustamante,Fernando J. S. Ramos,Renato Jorge Alves,Fernanda Chohfi Atallah,M Jackiu,Eduardo Souza Pacheco,R. Schmidt,Francesco Serra,Daniere Yurie Vieira Tomotani,Fernando G. Zampieri,Flávia Ribeiro Machado
标识
DOI:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006564
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Platelets play a critical role in the inflammatory response and coagulation. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) would reduce the intensity of organ dysfunction in septic patients. DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Five general ICUs in Brazil. PATIENTS: Adults with sepsis for no longer than 48 hours who had at least one severe organ dysfunction (lactate > 4 mmol/L, platelets < 100,000/mm 3 , Pa o 2 /F io 2 ratio < 200, or septic shock). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive 200 mg of ASA or placebo for 7 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the change in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between day 0 and day 7 or date of discharge/death. Safety outcomes were major bleeding and the number of blood transfusions within 14 days. The planned sample size was 218 with interim safety analyses after enrolling 109 and 163 patients. The study was discontinued due to higher frequency of major bleeding in the ASA group. We included 166 patients (ASA: 82 patients, placebo: 84). In the adjusted analysis, there was no difference in the SOFA change between the groups (mean placebo to ASA group difference, 0.60; 95% CI, –0.55 to 1.75; p = 0.30). There were no differences in any of the secondary outcomes. In the intervention group, there were a higher number of serious adverse events (9 [11%] vs. 1 [1.2%]; p = 0.009) and major bleeding (8 [8.5%] vs. 1 [1.2%]; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this population of septic patients, ASA did not reduce the intensity of organ dysfunction. ASA increased the risk of severe bleeding compared with placebo.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI