Dialysis Modality Preference of Patients With CKD and Family Caregivers: A Discrete-Choice Study

医学 透析 家庭血液透析 肾脏疾病 血液透析 腹膜透析 内科学 肾功能 重症监护医学 儿科
作者
Rachael L. Morton,Paul Snelling,Angela C Webster,John M. Rose,Rosemary Masterson,David W. Johnson,Kirsten Howard
出处
期刊:American Journal of Kidney Diseases [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:60 (1): 102-111 被引量:112
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.030
摘要

Background Dialysis modality preferences of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and family caregivers are important, yet rarely quantified. Study Design Prospective, unlabeled, discrete-choice experiment with random-parameter logit analysis. Setting & Participants Adults with stages 3-5 CKD and caregivers educated about dialysis treatment options from 8 Australian renal clinics. Predictors Preferences for and trade-offs between the dialysis treatment attributes of life expectancy, number of hospital visits per week, ability to travel, hours per treatment, treatment time of day, subsidized transport service, and flexibility of treatment schedule. Outcomes & Measurements Results presented as ORs for preferring home-based or in-center dialysis to conservative care. Results 105 predialysis patients and 73 family caregivers completed the study. Median patient age was 63 years, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 18.1 (range, 6-34) mL/min/1.73 m2. Median caregiver age was 61 years. Home-based dialysis (either peritoneal or home hemodialysis) was chosen by patients in 65% of choice sets; in-center dialysis, in 35%; and conservative care, in 10%. For caregivers, this was 72%, 25%, and 3%, respectively. Both patients and caregivers preferred longer rather than shorter hours of dialysis (ORs of 2.02 [95% CI, 1.51-2.70] and 2.67 [95% CI, 1.85-3.85] for patients and caregivers, respectively), but were less likely to choose nocturnal than daytime dialysis (ORs of 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.75] and 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.20]). Patients were willing to forgo 23 (95% CI, 19-27) months of life expectancy with home-based dialysis to decrease their travel restrictions. For caregivers, this was 17 (95% CI, 16-18) patient-months. Limitations Data were limited to stated preferences rather than actual choice of dialysis modality. Conclusions Our study suggests that it is rare for caregivers to prefer conservative nondialytic care for family members with CKD. Home-based dialysis modalities that enable patients and their family members to travel with minimal restriction would be strongly aligned with the preferences of both parties. Dialysis modality preferences of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and family caregivers are important, yet rarely quantified. Prospective, unlabeled, discrete-choice experiment with random-parameter logit analysis. Adults with stages 3-5 CKD and caregivers educated about dialysis treatment options from 8 Australian renal clinics. Preferences for and trade-offs between the dialysis treatment attributes of life expectancy, number of hospital visits per week, ability to travel, hours per treatment, treatment time of day, subsidized transport service, and flexibility of treatment schedule. Results presented as ORs for preferring home-based or in-center dialysis to conservative care. 105 predialysis patients and 73 family caregivers completed the study. Median patient age was 63 years, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 18.1 (range, 6-34) mL/min/1.73 m2. Median caregiver age was 61 years. Home-based dialysis (either peritoneal or home hemodialysis) was chosen by patients in 65% of choice sets; in-center dialysis, in 35%; and conservative care, in 10%. For caregivers, this was 72%, 25%, and 3%, respectively. Both patients and caregivers preferred longer rather than shorter hours of dialysis (ORs of 2.02 [95% CI, 1.51-2.70] and 2.67 [95% CI, 1.85-3.85] for patients and caregivers, respectively), but were less likely to choose nocturnal than daytime dialysis (ORs of 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.75] and 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.20]). Patients were willing to forgo 23 (95% CI, 19-27) months of life expectancy with home-based dialysis to decrease their travel restrictions. For caregivers, this was 17 (95% CI, 16-18) patient-months. Data were limited to stated preferences rather than actual choice of dialysis modality. Our study suggests that it is rare for caregivers to prefer conservative nondialytic care for family members with CKD. Home-based dialysis modalities that enable patients and their family members to travel with minimal restriction would be strongly aligned with the preferences of both parties.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
认真水儿发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
tt发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
cm完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
叶欢发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
1秒前
wxq发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
脑洞疼应助鹿梦采纳,获得10
1秒前
嘴嘴是大嘴007完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
酷炫翠桃完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
ghost完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Chikit完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
大气的山彤完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
科目三应助夏日葵采纳,获得10
2秒前
coldspringhao完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
慧慧hui发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小蟹完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
万能图书馆应助诺之采纳,获得10
3秒前
吴晗硕查文献完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
SJW--666完成签到,获得积分0
4秒前
bb发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
无奈的小虾米完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
小二郎应助wwww采纳,获得10
5秒前
Lalalala关注了科研通微信公众号
5秒前
5秒前
风趣的紫菜完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
科研通AI5应助无名采纳,获得10
6秒前
谨慎芙完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
鹿梦完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
8秒前
木头人重新开启了婷婷文献应助
8秒前
旺仔发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
卜卜脆完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
ntzzz完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI2S应助迅速的仰采纳,获得10
9秒前
yoesyte发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
陈曦完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
Thinking Small and Large 500
Algorithmic Mathematics in Machine Learning 500
Handbook of Innovations in Political Psychology 400
Mapping the Stars: Celebrity, Metonymy, and the Networked Politics of Identity 400
Getting Published in SSCI Journals: 200+ Questions and Answers for Absolute Beginners 300
Engineering the boosting of the magnetic Purcell factor with a composite structure based on nanodisk and ring resonators 240
Cardiopulmonary Bypass 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3837974
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3380164
关于积分的说明 10512727
捐赠科研通 3099729
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1707202
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 821527
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 772685