已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Dialysis Modality Preference of Patients With CKD and Family Caregivers: A Discrete-Choice Study

医学 透析 家庭血液透析 肾脏疾病 血液透析 腹膜透析 内科学 肾功能 重症监护医学 儿科
作者
Rachael L. Morton,Paul Snelling,Angela C Webster,John M. Rose,Rosemary Masterson,David W. Johnson,Kirsten Howard
出处
期刊:American Journal of Kidney Diseases [Elsevier]
卷期号:60 (1): 102-111 被引量:112
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.030
摘要

Background Dialysis modality preferences of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and family caregivers are important, yet rarely quantified. Study Design Prospective, unlabeled, discrete-choice experiment with random-parameter logit analysis. Setting & Participants Adults with stages 3-5 CKD and caregivers educated about dialysis treatment options from 8 Australian renal clinics. Predictors Preferences for and trade-offs between the dialysis treatment attributes of life expectancy, number of hospital visits per week, ability to travel, hours per treatment, treatment time of day, subsidized transport service, and flexibility of treatment schedule. Outcomes & Measurements Results presented as ORs for preferring home-based or in-center dialysis to conservative care. Results 105 predialysis patients and 73 family caregivers completed the study. Median patient age was 63 years, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 18.1 (range, 6-34) mL/min/1.73 m2. Median caregiver age was 61 years. Home-based dialysis (either peritoneal or home hemodialysis) was chosen by patients in 65% of choice sets; in-center dialysis, in 35%; and conservative care, in 10%. For caregivers, this was 72%, 25%, and 3%, respectively. Both patients and caregivers preferred longer rather than shorter hours of dialysis (ORs of 2.02 [95% CI, 1.51-2.70] and 2.67 [95% CI, 1.85-3.85] for patients and caregivers, respectively), but were less likely to choose nocturnal than daytime dialysis (ORs of 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.75] and 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.20]). Patients were willing to forgo 23 (95% CI, 19-27) months of life expectancy with home-based dialysis to decrease their travel restrictions. For caregivers, this was 17 (95% CI, 16-18) patient-months. Limitations Data were limited to stated preferences rather than actual choice of dialysis modality. Conclusions Our study suggests that it is rare for caregivers to prefer conservative nondialytic care for family members with CKD. Home-based dialysis modalities that enable patients and their family members to travel with minimal restriction would be strongly aligned with the preferences of both parties. Dialysis modality preferences of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and family caregivers are important, yet rarely quantified. Prospective, unlabeled, discrete-choice experiment with random-parameter logit analysis. Adults with stages 3-5 CKD and caregivers educated about dialysis treatment options from 8 Australian renal clinics. Preferences for and trade-offs between the dialysis treatment attributes of life expectancy, number of hospital visits per week, ability to travel, hours per treatment, treatment time of day, subsidized transport service, and flexibility of treatment schedule. Results presented as ORs for preferring home-based or in-center dialysis to conservative care. 105 predialysis patients and 73 family caregivers completed the study. Median patient age was 63 years, and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 18.1 (range, 6-34) mL/min/1.73 m2. Median caregiver age was 61 years. Home-based dialysis (either peritoneal or home hemodialysis) was chosen by patients in 65% of choice sets; in-center dialysis, in 35%; and conservative care, in 10%. For caregivers, this was 72%, 25%, and 3%, respectively. Both patients and caregivers preferred longer rather than shorter hours of dialysis (ORs of 2.02 [95% CI, 1.51-2.70] and 2.67 [95% CI, 1.85-3.85] for patients and caregivers, respectively), but were less likely to choose nocturnal than daytime dialysis (ORs of 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.75] and 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01-0.20]). Patients were willing to forgo 23 (95% CI, 19-27) months of life expectancy with home-based dialysis to decrease their travel restrictions. For caregivers, this was 17 (95% CI, 16-18) patient-months. Data were limited to stated preferences rather than actual choice of dialysis modality. Our study suggests that it is rare for caregivers to prefer conservative nondialytic care for family members with CKD. Home-based dialysis modalities that enable patients and their family members to travel with minimal restriction would be strongly aligned with the preferences of both parties.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
zzZZ发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
N1shimiya留下了新的社区评论
1秒前
澳澳发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
闪闪路灯发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小陈完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
xtt发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
江湖小妖发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
snail01完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
高级牛马完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
无花果应助小宇搞科研采纳,获得10
11秒前
长矛沾屎戳谁谁死完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
yang发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
菲子笑发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
18秒前
18秒前
小马甲应助琪琪采纳,获得10
18秒前
李红梅完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
lin完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
21秒前
动人的沅发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
儒雅的若完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
沉静的不悔应助十三艘船采纳,获得10
22秒前
小懒发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
25秒前
25秒前
清秀的碧彤完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
无花果应助澳澳采纳,获得10
29秒前
雪城完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
高分求助中
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 5000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Propeller Design 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 1500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 化学工程 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 冶金 细胞生物学 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6011759
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7562893
关于积分的说明 16137597
捐赠科研通 5158579
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2762814
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1741663
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1633695