批判性思维
审查
背景(考古学)
药店
工程伦理学
多样性(控制论)
心理学
医学
教育学
计算机科学
政治学
工程类
护理部
人工智能
法学
古生物学
生物
作者
Michael J. Peeters,Kimberly L. Zitko,Kimberly A. Schmude
标识
DOI:10.24926/iip.v7i1.415
摘要
The concept of development is ubiquitous throughout higher education. Development of critical thinking, problem-solving, and clinical reasoning are noted as important outcomes in higher education, including health professions education. In this era of widening scrutiny, demonstration of this outcome within programmatic assessment is becoming increasingly important. Programmatic assessment of critical thinking is complicated because of its multiple definitions, array of theoretical frameworks, and variety of measurement instruments. Additionally, recent guidelines and standards for pharmacy education have affirmed “habits of mind,” which are not new to education and encompass analytical critical thinking. In this paper, we sought to provide: 1) an overview of various critical thinking measurement instruments with their different associated critical thinking definitions, 2) a background and framework for thinking using the Dimensions of Learning model, 3) implications and applications for assessing cognitive development (critical and complex thinking) within the context of pharmacy education, and 4) specific suggestions for assessment in pharmacy education.
Type: Idea Paper
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI