医学
秩相关
相关性
更年期
评定量表
斯皮尔曼秩相关系数
血管舒缩
更年期
内科学
妇科
临床心理学
物理疗法
统计
几何学
数学
作者
Laura Vilela e Souza,Amanda Costa Araujo,Angélica Nakagawa Lima
出处
期刊:Menopause
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2022-06-01
卷期号:29 (6): 700-706
被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1097/gme.0000000000001965
摘要
The number of specific scales to measure menopausal symptoms has increased significantly in the last decades. However, the lack of standardization as well as prioritization of which scale should be used in exploring menopausal symptoms poses problems in most populations. Thus, we aimed at demonstrating the correlation among four questionnaires evaluating menopausal symptoms: the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS), Kupperman Menopausal Index, and Women's Health Questionnaire (WHQ).We recruited 336 women between 40 and 65 years of age who responded to all four questionnaires. For each questionnaire, we calculated the overall score and the subscale scores. We then compared variables using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (Rho).We found a very strong correlation (Rho > 0.80; P < 0.001) between all the questionnaires. The strongest correlations were those observed in the comparisons involving the GCS (Rho 0.92-0.95; P < 0.001), whereas the weakest ones were observed using the WHQ scale (Rho -0.86 to -0.89; P < 0.001). Like in the overall score analyses, vasomotor, somatic, and psychological symptoms demonstrated the strongest correlations in the GCS comparisons and the weakest correlations between the WHQ and MRS.The MRS, GCS, Kupperman Menopausal Index, and WHQ assessed menopausal symptoms in a very similar way. We recommend further studies to adjust and improve the existing questionnaires, test their robustness in different settings, and ensure their applicability in research and clinical practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI